PDA

View Full Version : Waiting for "beast mode" to return to fair value?



jamcrew
04-28-2010, 07:57 AM
<DD>@Adam_Schefter (http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter) RT @Packers48094 (http://twitter.com/Packers48094): what are the possibility that marshawn lynch goes to the packers? ... Not happening. Bills adamant Lynch going nowhere. about an hour ago (http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter/status/13000311770)</DD>

jamze132
04-28-2010, 09:05 AM
Shefter doesn't know anymore than we do about Lynch.

Mahdi
04-28-2010, 09:24 AM
I think the Packers need a RB like Lynch. Their running game is soft and lacks a power component.

mayotm
04-28-2010, 09:34 AM
The best case scenario for the Bills is that a RB from a play-off contender gets hurt during the pre-season. They can then deal him for more than they can get now.

NOT THE DUDE...
04-28-2010, 09:44 AM
i dont think we should deal lynch at all... we need 3 good backs....

Stewie
04-28-2010, 09:47 AM
not really sure what "fair" value is anymore... Solid productive vets were had for day three picks. Bottom line: he's a marginal RB who provides injury insurance at a very cheap price. I would not be surprised if we kept him all year. Nor would I be surprisd if we let him go for a 5th or 6th.

DrGraves
04-28-2010, 09:55 AM
I don't understand why everyone thinks we need to move him.... the pressure is all on him. If he ever wants to get a new contract or be a feature back again in the NFL he needs to make the most of every single carry. We have nothing to lose by him sitting on the bench, but he does.

justasportsfan
04-28-2010, 10:10 AM
I think Spiller will be used a lot in the passing game which is why we're keeping Lynch unless Spiller and Bell breaks out as early as camp and someone makes a huge offer for Lynch. :idunno:

jpdex12
04-28-2010, 08:04 PM
Why not keep him for now? Fair value will arrive when some other teams loses their top running back in the pre-season or first four games of the season and then we watch the trade value for Lynch increase! And we keep three good running backs on our roster. Why trade him for a 4th or 5th round pick when we could save him, use him and get more under better circumstances?

YardRat
04-28-2010, 08:11 PM
http://www.fantasysp.com/player/nfl/Marshawn_Lynch/878195


ESPN's Adam Schefter recently named Marshawn Lynch (http://www.fantasysp.com/nfl_player_news/Marshawn_Lynch/) the player most likely to be traded, ahead of Brandon Marshall (http://www.fantasysp.com/nfl_player_news/Brandon_Marshall/) and Jason Campbell (http://www.fantasysp.com/nfl_player_news/Jason_Campbell/).

Philagape
04-28-2010, 08:18 PM
How about Tennessee? They have just UDFAs to try to replace White

SabreEleven
04-28-2010, 08:25 PM
I'm waiting for Lynch to show up on a police blotter again but the off season is still young.

patmoran2006
04-28-2010, 08:41 PM
I don't understand why everyone thinks we need to move him.... the pressure is all on him. If he ever wants to get a new contract or be a feature back again in the NFL he needs to make the most of every single carry. We have nothing to lose by him sitting on the bench, but he does.

You'll find out that answer to your first sentence this summer when the team reports. First, if he even reports, and secondly, how hard he'll work being the #3 here.

Stay tuned..

jamze132
04-29-2010, 06:08 AM
If Bell performs this summer and then at camp, you can rest assured that unless Lynch is on his best behavior and "beastin'" it, he's gone one way or another.