PDA

View Full Version : Buffalo moving up the Stanley Cup drought


TheGhostofJimKelly
06-10-2010, 09:52 PM
They are now tied for 2nd

1. Toronto - 42 seasons (last won in 67)
2. Los Angeles - 42 seasons
3. St. Louis - 42 seasons
4. Buffalo - 39 seasons
5. Vancouver - 39 seasons
6. Boston - 38 seasons (last won in 72)
JD
06-10-2010, 11:59 PM
They are now tied for 2nd

1. Toronto - 42 seasons (last won in 67)
2. Los Angeles - 42 seasons
3. St. Louis - 42 seasons
4. Buffalo - 39 seasons
5. Vancouver - 39 seasons
6. Boston - 38 seasons (last won in 72)

..that's all professional sports? Where are the Bills?
YardRat
06-11-2010, 12:48 AM
I blame Ralph Wilson.
SabreEleven
06-11-2010, 02:19 AM
They are now tied for 2nd

1. Toronto - 42 seasons (last won in 67)
2. Los Angeles - 42 seasons
3. St. Louis - 42 seasons
4. Buffalo - 39 seasons
5. Vancouver - 39 seasons
6. Boston - 38 seasons (last won in 72)

Tied for 3rd.
SabreEleven
06-11-2010, 02:19 AM
..that's all professional sports? Where are the Bills?

That's obviously just hockey.
JD
06-11-2010, 02:48 AM
That's obviously just hockey.
Too young to know the Kings were around that long old timer lol
TMu11
06-11-2010, 05:06 AM
Tied for 3rd.
How do you figure 3rd?
TheGhostofJimKelly
06-11-2010, 06:36 AM
Tied for 3rd.


Three teams tied at 42, Sabres are tied at second with 39.
TheGhostofJimKelly
06-11-2010, 06:37 AM
..that's all professional sports? Where are the Bills?


Stanley Cup drought, what is going on here?
RockStar36
06-11-2010, 07:48 AM
That's obviously just hockey.

The words "Stanley" and "Cup" in the title should have been enough to suggest that.
hydro
06-11-2010, 07:48 AM
Stanley Cup drought, what is going one here?

on
ddaryl
06-11-2010, 09:12 AM
sad thing is I'm pretty sure were destined to be the #1 SC drought team some day.

I have no faith... Wish I did but I just do not believe Buffalo will ever be a winner.... Not with the decision making processes we endure in Buffalo sports
Philagape
06-11-2010, 09:18 AM
Actually, they're tied for fourth. One's place in a list like this is determined by the number of teams ahead of them, not the number of numbers.
At least that's what I see in golf standings.
psubills62
06-11-2010, 09:23 AM
Actually, they're tied for fourth. One's place in a list like this is determined by the number of teams ahead of them, not the number of numbers.
At least that's what I see in golf standings.

Thank you. When there are three teams ahead of them, they are tied for fourth.
TheGhostofJimKelly
06-11-2010, 09:46 AM
on

fixed
G Wolly
06-11-2010, 11:05 AM
Next years finals matchup.

Buffalo vs Vancouver

DUN DUN DUN