If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Re: Steve Johnson starting No. 2 WR at Mandatory OTAs
Originally posted by OpIv37
So much for that argument about the current coaching staff believing in Parrish...
Parrish plays slot.
Johnson lined up as the No. 2 on the outside.
While I think Parrish is a waste of a roster spot, I don't see how Johnson lining up as the No. 2 receiver effects Parrish and the coaching staff's thoughts on him.
Re: Steve Johnson starting No. 2 WR at Mandatory OTAs
This is good thing. It means Steve has shown enough that the coaches want to see what it looks like with him running in the #2 slot. Doesn't mean he stays there, but it implies they like what he's shown them.
Comment