lynch?

[wozrob11]

Now that spiller has signed how long will it take for lynch to be delt? We can' t keep 3...... can we?

[OpIv37]

Re: lynch?

unless someone comes up with a ridiculous offer, we'll keep all 3.

[ddaryl]

Re: lynch?

if we can a get a 2nd rounder for Lynch then pull the trigger... we need ammunition for a move up to grab a QB next year

[wozrob11]

Re: lynch?

What are we trying to get for him by the way a 4th round?

[chubluv]

Re: lynch?

Why cant we use all 3? All of them can catch the ball FJ &ML both have become better blockers. I think if used right they can be useful. No wether the three of them can all get a long on the field and except that they will share the load is another question.

[Jaybird]

Re: lynch?

Lynch aint gowing anywhere, unless a top rb on another team goes down with injury adn we get a big offer. Expect Jackson to start and spiller to play a lot fo slot wr

[HHURRICANE]

Re: lynch?

Unless we are getting a proven player for Lynch than anything less than a 2nd rounder makes zero sense especially when he was a first rounder.

We are better off keeping.

However if we can package him to get an LT I would be pretty okay with that.

[ddaryl]

Re: lynch?

Lynch aint gowing anywhere, unless a top rb on another team goes down with injury adn we get a big offer. Expect Jackson to start and spiller to play a lot fo slot wr

I sincerely hope to see Jackson and Spiller in the receiving game much more often this year...

[ddaryl]

Re: lynch?

Unless we are getting a proven player for Lynch than anything less than a 2nd rounder makes zero sense especially when he was a first rounder.

We are better off keeping.

However if we can package him to get an LT I would be pretty okay with that.

a player that can start and fills a need would be a welcomed trade IMO

[Jan Reimers]

Re: lynch?

I don't think we can get enough for Lynch to make a great deal of difference this season. We're better off keeping him and creating a multi-headed running attack, with Jackson and Spiller getting lots of balls thrown their way as well.

[justasportsfan]

Re: lynch?

a player that can start and fills a need would be a welcomed trade IMO

I agree. Lynch for Brees , straight up.

[trapezeus]

Re: lynch?

the way the QB descriptions have gone, we should keep all the RBs, and ditch all the QB's and just run everyone. Have 3 RB's on the field at the same time. Freddy can throw, marshawn can throw. bell, simpson and spiller can run.

[DraftBoy]

Re: lynch?

We may keep 4 or 5 RB's, Gailey has a history of keeping a good number of RB's. He had 3 FB's on Dallas at one point.

[BertSquirtgum]

Re: lynch?

i can't believe i'm reading this bulls--t. of course we're keeping at least three. jesus h christ. how many times does this need to be explained.

[Commissioner]

Re: lynch?

We need all the talent we can get. Marshawn Lynch is a different runner than Jackson and especially Spiller.

What happens if we get rid of Lynch and Jackson or Spiller go down with an injury? Then we become completely 1 dimension with our running game.