Why no Brohm?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • more cowbell
    Registered User
    • Apr 2006
    • 1489

    Why no Brohm?

    I was interested to see how he would perform but obviously he didn't play tonight. Was he hurt? or does he really just suck that much that he can't even get on the field in pre-season?
    The last time the Bills made the playoffs was 1999.
  • Michael82
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 82328

    #2
    Re: Why no Brohm?

    It sounds like Gailey plans to do the rotating in the games too. Brohm gets the #2 reps for the Colts game on Thursday.

    Comment

    • Johnny Bugmenot
      Will not tolerate vandalism.
      • Apr 2006
      • 4311

      #3
      Re: Why no Brohm?

      As I said in another thread, I'm guessing preservation.

      Comment

      • BillsWin
        man amongst boys
        • Oct 2008
        • 6025

        #4
        Re: Why no Brohm?

        Fitz got a lot of snaps today. I can almost guarantee that Brohm will get those reps or more against the Colts on Thursday.
        I am The Batman.

        Comment

        • more cowbell
          Registered User
          • Apr 2006
          • 1489

          #5
          Re: Why no Brohm?

          makes sense...i just wasn't aware if he suffered an injury this week i didnt hear about
          The last time the Bills made the playoffs was 1999.

          Comment

          • BillsWin
            man amongst boys
            • Oct 2008
            • 6025

            #6
            Re: Why no Brohm?

            It's not like Brohm will have a lot to do on Thursday to out perform Fitzpatrick. I was a big Fitz fan when we signed him because I figured him to be a decent backup. I wanted him to take Edwards' spot last season when Trent was struggling.

            But tonight, his first few series were borderline atrocious.

            I hope Brohm will do better and think he has a very good chance to do so.
            I am The Batman.

            Comment

            • BillsWin
              man amongst boys
              • Oct 2008
              • 6025

              #7
              Re: Why no Brohm?

              Not really borderline. They WERE atrocious.
              I am The Batman.

              Comment

              • better days
                Registered User
                • Jan 2010
                • 22028

                #8
                Re: Why no Brohm?

                I think after this game, Brohm should jump to 1st place in the pecking order. Fitz was Fitz & Trent was Trent. Since Fitz replaced Trent last year & they both look the same as last year, Brohm & Fitz to fight it out, then Brown. CUT TRENT.
                Last edited by better days; 08-13-2010, 10:15 PM.

                Comment

                • sdbillsfan2
                  Registered User
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 1164

                  #9
                  Re: Why no Brohm?

                  Trent didn't look like a Qb going into his 4th year...And he sure isn't the answer for starting qb . The league has him figured out.! Just paint a bullseye on his chest ..


                  Seriously...how much worse could Brohm have been ? A loss is a loss.
                  Last edited by sdbillsfan2; 08-13-2010, 10:23 PM.

                  " I'd try to see things from your point of view but..........there's only room up your a** for one head ! "

                  Comment

                  • Michael82
                    Registered User
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 82328

                    #10
                    Re: Why no Brohm?

                    Originally posted by sdbillsfan2
                    Trent didn't look like a Qb going into his 4th year...And he sure isn't the answer for starting qb . The league has him figured out.! Just paint a bullseye on his chest ..


                    Seriously...how much worse could Brohm have been ? A loss is a loss.
                    Exactly! Good post.

                    Comment

                    • jmb1099
                      Registered User
                      • Sep 2004
                      • 3354

                      #11
                      Re: Why no Brohm?

                      Brohm will top those performances.

                      Comment

                      • Prov401
                        President of WADL (Whitner Anti-Defamation League)
                        • Aug 2008
                        • 1651

                        #12
                        Re: Why no Brohm?

                        I wouldn't be suprised if Brohm gets the starting nod next week.

                        If anything, he will be taking Ftiz' reps.

                        Comment

                        • BillsWin
                          man amongst boys
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 6025

                          #13
                          Re: Why no Brohm?

                          Fitz was putting on a clinic of how NOT to play QB for a while there.

                          I was literally laughing at him. Which is sad, because I like the guy. But, come on!
                          I am The Batman.

                          Comment

                          • BillsWin
                            man amongst boys
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 6025

                            #14
                            Re: Why no Brohm?

                            Hey Cowbell, this is from Chris Brown on Brohm not playing:

                            Don’t expect to see Brohm tonight

                            By Chris Brown - Posted August 13, 2010 – 5:05 pm
                            The plan at the quarterback position for tonight’s preseason opener is Trent Edwards will start, play a quarter or so and then give way to Ryan Fitzpatrick and the second unit. After that however, the next QB in is expected to be rookie Levi Brown.
                            According to head coach Chan Gailey it’s no reflection on Brian Brohm’s play. It’s a matter of giving the backups enough time on the field. Gailey has chosen to play only three QBs tonight to give the backups sufficient time to get into a rhythm on offense. He believes if he tries to get Fitzpatrick and Brohm into the game as well as Brown at the end that a situation could arise where Fitz or Brohm made only get nine plays tops, hardly enough to evaluate a QB in a preseason game.
                            He would like to give both Fitzpatrick and Brohm more consecutive series so they can make a better case for themselves. So Brohm is not expected to play tonight, but in the next preseason game against Indy, the plan is to have Brohm come in and play after Trent Edwards and Ryan Fitzpatrick will not play.
                            So nothing should be read into Brohm’s absence of playing time tonight with respect to the QB competition, but the only way he takes the field is if there is an injury at the quarterback position.
                            I am The Batman.

                            Comment

                            • TigerJ
                              Registered User
                              • Jul 2002
                              • 22575

                              #15
                              Re: Why no Brohm?

                              Originally posted by Mikey82
                              It sounds like Gailey plans to do the rotating in the games too. Brohm gets the #2 reps for the Colts game on Thursday.
                              That's my guess too. It's no surprise to see Levi Brown is getting the crumbs at the end of the game, being the rookie of the bunch. I expect Fitz will sit next Thursday.
                              I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

                              I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X