See?!

[trapezeus]

isn't it better to live without a #1 ST and have mildly capable offenses and defenses?

[Mad Max]

Re: See?!

isn't it better to live without a #1 ST and have mildly capable offenses and defenses?

lol. yes. It's comical when some people rode Moormans jock...a friggin punter is our best player?

[Dr. Lecter]

Re: See?!

The two are not mutually exclusive.

[trapezeus]

Re: See?!

if thy were, id rather watch a game like this, than watch any of the games like last year where you were bored to tears and only had one decent punt return and a bunch fo 45+ yard punts to be excited about.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: See?!

The two are not mutually exclusive.

In the case of the Bills it was.

We kept around bums for many years because they were ST stars who contributed nothing elsewhere.

Purge the bums, get real players in here who can contribute on either side of the football.

[TacklingDummy]

Re: See?!

In the case of the Bills it was.

We kept around bums for many years because they were ST stars who contributed nothing elsewhere.

Purge the bums, get real players in here who can contribute on either side of the football.

You mean guys like Josh Stamer?

[TMu11]

Re: See?!

lol. yes. It's comical when some people rode Moormans jock...a friggin punter is our best player?

Well ..... he was

[zone]

Re: See?!

isn't it better to live without a #1 ST and have mildly capable offenses and defenses?

It is but, we can not give the opponent a short field every time either or we are going to be in trouble.

[Michael82]

Re: See?!

Yeah it is better...but our special teams made me nervous as hell all game. DeHaven doesn't have the guys in their proper lanes yet. I hope he can fix this.