If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
If you watched the game again, why would the Bills should cut Brohm?
He did nothing great and that screen pass cost us a TD in the red zone. When Gailey looks at the tape again he won't be too impressed with that. This was the problem with Losman. When asked to execute a simple screen pass he couldn't do it.
I don't hate Brohm but honestly after rewatching the game he did nothing "better" than Fitzpatrick would have done. Matter-of-fact I think there would have been 7 points had Fitzpatrick been in there. And for the record I hate Fitzpatrick.
He did nothing great and that screen pass cost us a TD in the red zone. When Gailey looks at the tape again he won't be too impressed with that. This was the problem with Losman. When asked to execute a simple screen pass he couldn't do it.
I don't hate Brohm but honestly after rewatching the game he did nothing "better" than Fitzpatrick would have done. Matter-of-fact I think there would have been 7 points had Fitzpatrick been in there. And for the record I hate Fitzpatrick.
Thanks, I like Brohm and think Fitz is ok, but not great.
The Mexican & too!!
- Adriano & Emiliano, the next Villa & Zapata. Viva Mexico, cabrones!!! -
He did nothing great and that screen pass cost us a TD in the red zone. When Gailey looks at the tape again he won't be too impressed with that. This was the problem with Losman. When asked to execute a simple screen pass he couldn't do it.
I don't hate Brohm but honestly after rewatching the game he did nothing "better" than Fitzpatrick would have done. Matter-of-fact I think there would have been 7 points had Fitzpatrick been in there. And for the record I hate Fitzpatrick.
Ah good, I'm glad you aren't jumping to assumptions based on a single play. It was one screen pass, and the main reason it would have been a TD is because Brohm did a good job of looking to the right side first and leading the D away from it. I don't see Edwards or Fitz looking off the D very often.
While I don't think Brohm clearly outplayed either QB with his performance, there were a lot of things to like about it that were refreshing after seeing Laurel and Hardy play QB last year. Fitz is horrible and his upside is about 200 yards per game with a TD:INT ratio of less than 1. Brohm has better upside, is cheaper, and plays pretty much the same. Why wouldn't they keep Brohm?
"Misguided political correctness tethers our intellects."
- Nicholas Cummings
Ah good, I'm glad you aren't jumping to assumptions based on a single play.
By HH's logic, if Chans decision is based on a single play then Trent would have been benched after his INT in the first preseason. The missed screen play didn't give the other team 7 points unlike the INT .
Chan may not be impressed with Brohm but he isn't impressed by Trent either or else Trent would have been named the starter already. The fact that there is still an ongoing competition means HH doesn't know what he's talking about, as usual.
HH may not love Brohm but he's got a boner for Trent.
Comment