Amongst the 2.5 million "realist" arguments in the Zone, a common theme is that the FO didn't address our needs. Fair enough.
These arguments claim to be "based on facts" and if you dare say the FO did an admirable job, and we are better than advertised, you are the "ray rah go Bills" homer.
My question is what moves would you have done differently. I am not being a smartass, totally serious.
I know it will be hard to say you wouldn't have taken Spiller, but many said that in April. You can't say it now, he has shown glimpses of what he is, so you can be wrong.
I'd prefer not a lot of slamming but anshort explanation of what moves you may have made. It wod be nice if you want to defend/object any player movements made, if it could be a better argument than "he sucks."
Unfortunately I am on my phone, so this has been a challenge to type. I will offer my opinion when I get to my computer.
These arguments claim to be "based on facts" and if you dare say the FO did an admirable job, and we are better than advertised, you are the "ray rah go Bills" homer.
My question is what moves would you have done differently. I am not being a smartass, totally serious.
I know it will be hard to say you wouldn't have taken Spiller, but many said that in April. You can't say it now, he has shown glimpses of what he is, so you can be wrong.
I'd prefer not a lot of slamming but anshort explanation of what moves you may have made. It wod be nice if you want to defend/object any player movements made, if it could be a better argument than "he sucks."
Unfortunately I am on my phone, so this has been a challenge to type. I will offer my opinion when I get to my computer.
Comment