Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • jamze132
    Registered User
    • Jun 2003
    • 29290
    #1

    Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

    The Fish are probably going to have 200+ on the ground tomorrow. Our LB corps really looks horrible on paper. No need for Henne to test our secondary when Cheech and Chong are running the ball down your gullet.

    The question is, can the Bills offense sustain long drives ending in points? If our defense is able to catch their breath, we have a chance at the end of the day.
    Last edited by jamze132; 09-11-2010, 01:53 AM.
    Tags: None
  • Night Train
    Retired - On Several Levels
    • Jul 2005
    • 33117
    #2
    Re: Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

    Mitchell and his signature arm tackles wasn't starting anyhow. He'd only aid the opposing running game.

    Shutting down the Fins rushing game will be the key. It looks like rain may play a factor, which will make it even tougher.

    Bills will need to keep some drives going and not have their own D burn out.
    Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

    Comment

    • Buddo
      Registered User
      • Mar 2007
      • 1864
      #3
      Re: Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

      The only 'comforting' thing, is that the Fish have their own problems with late changes and injuries. I get the feeling that this game may actually be more exciting than quite a few others,as much from inadequacies on both sides, than anything else.
      I've thought all along that we need to get ahead, and force the fish to throw, but I think that's moreso the case now.
      One other thing that might be something to consider, would be using a lot more 4-3 fronts this game, as the players we will be using, are far more used to that, and it may provide our D with a better platform from which to make some plays.
      TBH, I'm quite happy with the switch to the 3-4 being the 'way to go', but sometimes circumstances can dictate an alternative, and in this game, I wouldn't consider it to be so much 'backsliding' as possibly utilitarian.
      • 👍 1

      Comment

      • YardRat
        Well, lookie here...
        • Dec 2004
        • 86147
        #4
        Re: Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

        Hopefully the run blitz packages will be dusted off tomorrow. If the LBers aren't able to step up, it could get ugly.
        YardRat Wall of Fame
        #56 DARRYL TALLEY         #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
        • 👍 1

        Comment

        • NOT THE DUDE...
          Formerly MARCELL DAREUS POWER, now posting as DANNY BATTEN POWER
          • Jan 2010
          • 8826
          #5
          Re: Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

          Im confindent in ellis kelsay davis and poz, they are big and strong enought to hold up...

          Comment

          • Jan Reimers
            Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
            • May 2003
            • 17353
            #6
            Re: Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

            We are probably better against the run without Mitchell, who is one of the worst tacklers I have ever seen.
            Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
            • 👍 2

            Comment

            • Beebe's Kid
              Registered User
              • Nov 2009
              • 3134
              #7
              Re: Not that Kawika Mitchell was worth a bag of crap...

              Ellis will win many fans tomorrow, as will Davis.

              Comment

              Previous template Next
              Working...
              X