Good, Bad, and Ugly!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HHURRICANE
    Registered User
    • Mar 2005
    • 15490

    Good, Bad, and Ugly!

    Good:

    McKelvin, Bell

    Bad:

    Poz, Whitner, Levitre

    Ugly:

    Edwards, Wood, Gailey, Green
  • Thief
    Registered User
    • Sep 2009
    • 820

    #2
    Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

    Good: D. Edwards, McKelvin, Florence

    Bad: Spiller, Wood, Levitre, Corner

    Ugly: Edwards, Green
    Last edited by Thief; 09-12-2010, 07:35 PM.

    Comment

    • topher180
      Registered User
      • Sep 2008
      • 581

      #3
      Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

      What about Spiller, HH? I thought he was gonna rip off like 150 and a TD. He was a "budding star" as someone argued with me about earlier this week. You just aren't addressing that part in your analysis?

      inĀ·ept
      Adjective: Having or showing no skill; clumsy.

      :historian:


      Comment

      • HHURRICANE
        Registered User
        • Mar 2005
        • 15490

        #4
        Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

        Davis looked pretty good as well. Should have had him on there.

        Comment

        • wmoz11
          Registered User
          • Sep 2008
          • 2117

          #5
          Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

          Poz was very good when he was in there. I can't understand how a guy with 8 tackles and a sack in one half is mentioned as BAD when the offense performed like they did today.

          If you're commenting on his injury - fine. If not, then it's pretty sad.

          Whitner was good, too.

          The only guy I'd single out defensively was Kelsay for being horrible.
          Last edited by wmoz11; 09-12-2010, 07:41 PM.

          Comment

          • HHURRICANE
            Registered User
            • Mar 2005
            • 15490

            #6
            Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

            Originally posted by topher180
            What about Spiller, HH? I thought he was gonna rip off like 150 and a TD. He was a "budding star" as someone argued with me about earlier this week. You just aren't addressing that part in your analysis?
            I think Gailey should have stuck with Spiller and let him gert his legs. It was obvious that the Fins basicallty said we are going to do everything in our power to contain him.

            Gailey got outcoached today. Welcome to the NFL...again.

            Comment

            • topher180
              Registered User
              • Sep 2008
              • 581

              #7
              Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

              Originally posted by wmoz11
              Poz was very good when he was in there. I can't understand how a guy with 8 tackles and a sack in one half is mentioned as BAD when the offense performed like they did today.

              If you're commenting on his injury - fine. If not, then it's pretty sad.
              I agree actually. He was more of a factor today then I have ever remembered him in the, I dunno, 5 other games he's actually played in over the last 3 years.

              inĀ·ept
              Adjective: Having or showing no skill; clumsy.

              :historian:


              Comment

              • patmoran2006
                Ole' Ralphie SCROOGE
                • Dec 2005
                • 19840

                #8
                Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                What game were you watching, calling Bell part of the "Good".. You do know he didn't finish the game either, and that Meredith took his place, right?

                Bell was awful-- the entire line was awful.. The only one who held his own up there today was actually Geoff Hangartner.

                I don't have the adjectives to describe how bad Cornell Green is.


                Join the BSD FB page by CLICKING HERE

                Follow us on twitter by CLICKING HERE

                Comment

                • Novacane
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 42348

                  #9
                  Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                  Just watched Gaileys PC. He complemented Demetrius Bells play WTF?

                  Comment

                  • Dr. Lecter
                    Zero for Zero!
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 67934

                    #10
                    Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                    Green was the worst player on the field.


                    Kelsay was pretty ugly too.

                    Florence was not that great either.

                    Parrish played well.
                    Originally posted by mysticsoto
                    Lecter is right in everything he said.

                    Comment

                    • Novacane
                      Registered User
                      • Jul 2002
                      • 42348

                      #11
                      Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                      Originally posted by wmoz11
                      Poz was very good when he was in there. I can't understand how a guy with 8 tackles and a sack in one half is mentioned as BAD when the offense performed like they did today.

                      If you're commenting on his injury - fine. If not, then it's pretty sad.

                      Whitner was good, too.

                      The only guys I'd single out defensively was Kelsay for being horrible.


                      Poz was bad in pass coverage

                      Comment

                      • billsfanryan
                        Registered User
                        • Jan 2010
                        • 161

                        #12
                        Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                        Good: dwan edwards, mckelvin, a. davis, nelson

                        bad: trent

                        Ugly: kelsay, merideth, NOT RUNNING THE G.D. BALL (5 rushes 2nd half), Cornell green, Reffing, maybin celebrating a 3rd down stop that he DOVE over the guy and missed the tackle on.


                        Pat i was at the game and watched bell as closely as my drunk face would allow me to and i thought he did well. Gailey said early in the week that Bell would not play the entire game. I noticed positive yardage with bell in and whenever merideth came in there was negative yardage
                        Last edited by billsfanryan; 09-12-2010, 07:44 PM.

                        Comment

                        • wmoz11
                          Registered User
                          • Sep 2008
                          • 2117

                          #13
                          Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                          I actually thought Florence was okay. He didn't get burnt at all, just out-physicalled by Edwards a few times. He had tight coverage most of the time.

                          McKelvin is the better corner, though.

                          Comment

                          • HHURRICANE
                            Registered User
                            • Mar 2005
                            • 15490

                            #14
                            Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                            Originally posted by wmoz11
                            Poz was very good when he was in there. I can't understand how a guy with 8 tackles and a sack in one half is mentioned as BAD when the offense performed like they did today.

                            If you're commenting on his injury - fine. If not, then it's pretty sad.

                            Whitner was good, too.

                            The only guy I'd single out defensively was Kelsay for being horrible.

                            Yeah Poz getting burned for 7 was awesome. Especially when they were inside the 20 and that was his sole responsibility.

                            Comment

                            • wmoz11
                              Registered User
                              • Sep 2008
                              • 2117

                              #15
                              Re: Good, Bad, and Ugly!

                              Originally posted by Novacane
                              Poz was bad in pass coverage
                              On 1 pass. And he wasn't too far out of position. It was a perfect throw behind the TE.

                              I love how you guys all dwell on one play where he wasn't even beaten badly and it took a perfect pass to beat him. You don't think a TE on a MLB isn't a mismatch for every other team in the NFL?
                              Last edited by wmoz11; 09-12-2010, 07:44 PM.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X