If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
The biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.
For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.com
The biggest thing we learned from the Bills is that they are a resilient bunch and did what they had to do to win instead of past years where they fold like a cheap lawn chair.
For news, articles and other "stuff"... BillsZone.com
The '84 team was bad but in a disappointing sort of way. They were 8-8 in '83 and falling back to 2-14 "happened". Since it was a one year thing after some mostly successful years people were not as upset. '85 was a cluster **** of epic proportions. That team had nothing and it kept getting worse. Compare and contrast:
HC:
85 - Hank Bullough
10 - Chan Gailey
Both are hard to understand (albeit for different reasons). Bullough was a blow hard that couldn't put a sentence together. Gailey simply has an accent. Both preached "hard working, nose to the grindstone" football but neither delievered. Gailey's team is at least a little disciplined.
QB:
85 - Vince Ferragamo
10 - Trent Edwards
Both were brought in/back under new coordinators in an attempt to resurrect their careers. Epic failure on both parts. VF could at least chuck the ball downfield. Both wore #5 (may they be the last Bills to EVER wear it again). Both were cut during the season never to see the light of day of an NFL starter ever again. Succession became a list of journeymen that fans prayed would be a savior.
OL
85 - Swiss cheese
10 - Swiss cheese
Both inept at pass blocking.
ST
85 - Good punter and above average PK
10 - Good punter and above average PK
Moorman might simply be the best player on the team except for Spiller. The same could be said for John Kidd. Both even hold for place kicks. Coverage teams were/are suspect but the return game isn't bad because it gets a lot of practice. Both, prone to fumbling.
do I need to go on? I am really depressed now.
Having lived through both - believe it or not this team is worse.
Yeah... i remember 85 fairly well, and i don't remember that team being as talent deprived as this one. there were some bright spots... and that team... while cover your face bad... atleast tried sometimes.
Last year i felt was about as bad (maybe even a little worse) as 85... this year feels much much worse then 85
I went to every game in 84 and 85, we use to buy extra tickets from the bus drivers and would go and sit in the last row under the scoreboard. I was 14 years old when we started and didn't care that the team stunk, we just loved having fun at the games. However, those 84 and 85 teams were what gave us the early 90s teams.
Comment