Fred Jackson named the starter

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Extremebillsfan247
    Registered User
    • Sep 2008
    • 3142

    Fred Jackson named the starter

    No surprise there, reported by the Bills main site. http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2010/1...s-the-starter/
  • elltrain22
    Registered User
    • Sep 2003
    • 4281

    #2
    Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

    Happy for him, and happy for us. He's a class act and deserves high praise from fans b/c all he does is play his butt off, and never complains about jack (and believe me he could). We all should be happy b/c he is versatile, and always seems to gain positive yardage.
    If you walk with Jesus today, you don't have anything to worry about tomorrow...

    Comment

    • Extremebillsfan247
      Registered User
      • Sep 2008
      • 3142

      #3
      Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

      Originally posted by elltrain22
      Happy for him, and happy for us. He's a class act and deserves high praise from fans b/c all he does is play his butt off, and never complains about jack (and believe me he could). We all should be happy b/c he is versatile, and always seems to gain positive yardage.
      agreed, no argument here. I think him and Spiller are a solid fit for a 1-2 punch. JMO

      Comment

      • WeAreArthurMoates
        Registered User
        • Feb 2009
        • 1642

        #4
        Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

        Originally posted by Extremebillsfan247
        agreed, no argument here. I think him and Spiller are a solid fit for a 1-2 punch. JMO
        Yep will be the Fred Taylor and MOJO type of tandem, cant wait to see it.

        Comment

        • cocamide
          Registered User
          • Oct 2006
          • 2106

          #5
          Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

          Originally posted by WeAreMarshawn23
          Yep will be the Fred Taylor and MOJO type of tandem, cant wait to see it.
          I just hope our O (minus Fitz) rushes the ball more than 15 times a game.

          Comment

          • billz83
            Registered User
            • Mar 2010
            • 445

            #6
            Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

            soooo..lemme get this straight we used a 1st round pick for a backup RB now?!?! Spiller isnt even better then fred jackson yet?!?! I dont give a **** if spiller "becomes" that back and blah blah blah so far he hasnt proven **** as a RB..i dunno if ur picked in the 1st round shouldnt u be a STARTER IMMEDIATELY?! thas what the 1st round is for...the developmental or project players get picked in the later rounds. i dont get y they wont just give spiller the ball mad times and see what he can do..or r they afraid he might not live up to the hype!

            Comment

            • Jan Reimers
              Thank You, Terry and Kim, for Saving the Bills. Now, Work on the Sabres.
              • May 2003
              • 17353

              #7
              Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

              Originally posted by billz83
              soooo..lemme get this straight we used a 1st round pick for a backup RB now?!?! Spiller isnt even better then fred jackson yet?!?! I dont give a **** if spiller "becomes" that back and blah blah blah so far he hasnt proven **** as a RB..i dunno if ur picked in the 1st round shouldnt u be a STARTER IMMEDIATELY?! thas what the 1st round is for...the developmental or project players get picked in the later rounds. i dont get y they wont just give spiller the ball mad times and see what he can do..or r they afraid he might not live up to the hype!
              Are you ever happy with ANYTHING involving the Bills?
              Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?

              Comment

              • billz83
                Registered User
                • Mar 2010
                • 445

                #8
                Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                Are you ever happy with ANYTHING involving the Bills?
                For the last fewww years hell nooo! how could u be with the incompetent crackheaded decisions that have been going on here..i been hearin wilson is serious about selling the team soon which i am EXTREMELY happy about..if that counts(they are gonna keep the team in buffalo?! i think which is great news)

                Comment

                • ddaryl
                  Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                  • Jan 2005
                  • 10714

                  #9
                  Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                  Jackson should be the starter. Spiller should be the dynamic. They need to create ways to get Spiller on the field. He is not going to endure the pounding of the starters roll behind this OL and this O.

                  Comment

                  • madness
                    Registered User
                    • Apr 2003
                    • 13690

                    #10
                    Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                    Originally posted by Jan Reimers
                    Are you ever happy with ANYTHING involving the Bills?
                    Had to throw another log on the fire, didn't you?

                    Comment

                    • Beebe's Kid
                      Registered User
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 3134

                      #11
                      Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                      Originally posted by billz83
                      soooo..lemme get this straight we used a 1st round pick for a backup RB now?!?! Spiller isnt even better then fred jackson yet?!?! I dont give a **** if spiller "becomes" that back and blah blah blah so far he hasnt proven **** as a RB..i dunno if ur picked in the 1st round shouldnt u be a STARTER IMMEDIATELY?! thas what the 1st round is for...the developmental or project players get picked in the later rounds. i dont get y they wont just give spiller the ball mad times and see what he can do..or r they afraid he might not live up to the hype!
                      U r str8 dope, home-E itz werd cuz u aint gotz PUNKS-U-A-SHON n u gotz mad zs an u sill be lik mad stupid yo STR8 UP u spekn troof 4 da erf

                      Comment

                      • JCBills
                        Registered User
                        • Jan 2010
                        • 3631

                        #12
                        Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                        Originally posted by billz83
                        soooo..lemme get this straight we used a 1st round pick for a backup RB now?!?! Spiller isnt even better then fred jackson yet?!?! I dont give a **** if spiller "becomes" that back and blah blah blah so far he hasnt proven **** as a RB..i dunno if ur picked in the 1st round shouldnt u be a STARTER IMMEDIATELY?! thas what the 1st round is for...the developmental or project players get picked in the later rounds. i dont get y they wont just give spiller the ball mad times and see what he can do..or r they afraid he might not live up to the hype!
                        So every first rounder ever taken was declared starter the second they were drafted?

                        Comment

                        • billz83
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2010
                          • 445

                          #13
                          Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                          Originally posted by Beebe's Kid
                          U r str8 dope, home-E itz werd cuz u aint gotz PUNKS-U-A-SHON n u gotz mad zs an u sill be lik mad stupid yo STR8 UP u spekn troof 4 da erf
                          i didnt know they let malibuz most wanted on these boards..ur definitely a loser..hopefully u go into the hood and try actin funny seee what happens ta u..u dont even F***** make sense u douchebag..go back to the woods where u came from ur sister is callin u..

                          Comment

                          • Oaf
                            Do you read what you write?
                            • Jun 2007
                            • 6151

                            #14
                            Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                            This is the way it should be.

                            Comment

                            • billz83
                              Registered User
                              • Mar 2010
                              • 445

                              #15
                              Re: Fred Jackson named the starter

                              Originally posted by JCBills
                              So every first rounder ever taken was declared starter the second they were drafted?
                              not when it comes to the buffalo bills they are declared a BUST here..but ya in most organizations that have a clue what they are doing their 1st rounders are contributing immediately to the team and making them better..i know summa u like to get the project/developmental 1st round draft choices but u koolaid drinkers need to understand thas what the LATER ROUNDS are for..the 1st ROUND is for IMPACT PLAYERS who are STARTERS! and what are the bills afraid of that spiller wont live up to the hype..they held maybin out and we all know y they did this because he SUCKS..not sayin spiller sucks by ANY MEANS but the 1st round is for NFL READY PLAYERS not developmental players..

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X