Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • justasportsfan
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 71580

    Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

    . ”I think we’ll probably end up being a true multiple front team instead of a true 3-4 team just because our personnel dictates that. I think we’re probably a little bit better suited. I’ve not talked to the defensive staff about this, but just looking at it on the surface right now, I’d probably say we’re going to be multiple front rather than a Kansas City which sits in 3-4 no matter what, or Cleveland which sits in 3-4 no matter what. I don’t see us being that team. I see us being more of a multiple team.”

    sacrifice1
    https://theinterviewwithgod.com/video/
  • X-Era
    What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
    • Feb 2005
    • 27670

    #2
    Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

    Originally posted by justasportsfan
    . ”I think we’ll probably end up being a true multiple front team instead of a true 3-4 team just because our personnel dictates that. I think we’re probably a little bit better suited. I’ve not talked to the defensive staff about this, but just looking at it on the surface right now, I’d probably say we’re going to be multiple front rather than a Kansas City which sits in 3-4 no matter what, or Cleveland which sits in 3-4 no matter what. I don’t see us being that team. I see us being more of a multiple team.”

    http://blogs.buffalobills.com/2011/0...o-be-multiple/
    Don't the Pats employ a similar approach?

    Comment

    • Michael82
      Registered User
      • Jul 2002
      • 82328

      #3
      Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

      Originally posted by X-Era
      Don't the Pats employ a similar approach?
      yup

      Comment

      • X-Era
        What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
        • Feb 2005
        • 27670

        #4
        Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

        Originally posted by Michael82
        yup
        Well you worry about being the master of none. But, it would give us more options for upgrades in the draft... that would mean 4-3 ends or LB'ers could still have a role. It may also mean that guys like Bowers, at some level Dareus would be fits because they could play in either. Could make for a lot of options on draft day.
        Last edited by X-Era; 01-03-2011, 04:06 PM.

        Comment

        • YardRat
          Well, lookie here...
          • Dec 2004
          • 86201

          #5
          Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

          "There ain't no dang way we're going to be able to pull off a true 34 with the players we got or gonna git."
          YardRat Wall of Fame
          #56 DARRYL TALLEY
          #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

          Comment

          • Night Train
            Retired - On Several Levels
            • Jul 2005
            • 33117

            #6
            Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

            This is no surprise. Kyle Willaims is not a 3-4 NT.
            Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

            Comment

            • DraftBoy
              Administrator
              • Jul 2002
              • 107434

              #7
              Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

              Now a guy like Fairley is more in play.
              COMING SOON...
              Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
              We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

              Comment

              • Ickybaluky
                Registered User
                • Jul 2003
                • 8884

                #8
                Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

                Originally posted by X-Era
                Don't the Pats employ a similar approach?
                The Pats are base 3-4 team that plays sub defenses over half the time. However, even when they play different fronts they 2-gap on the DL. Even if they are in a 4-3 they play it like a 3-4. They are multiple in their personnel, but surprisingly not varied in their actual defense.

                Comment

                • X-Era
                  What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 27670

                  #9
                  Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

                  Originally posted by DraftBoy
                  Now a guy like Fairley is more in play.
                  I guy I like a lot who didn't seem to fit before was Paea... also Jurrell Casey... I don't see either at 3, but what are your thoughts?

                  Comment

                  • Night Train
                    Retired - On Several Levels
                    • Jul 2005
                    • 33117

                    #10
                    Re: Bills ‘D’ to be multiple

                    Originally posted by DraftBoy
                    Now a guy like Fairley is more in play.
                    and Dareus
                    Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X