If buffalo really likes one of the QB's. Are you against a trade down to grab extra picks. We do have many holes.
Against a trade down?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Against a trade down?
I don't think most fans would be upset with trading down. The problem is finding a partner. I know everybody loves to trade down in all their mock drafts and in imaganation land, but it's just not that easy. Especially with the third pick in the draft.
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by mayotmI don't think most fans would be upset with trading down. The problem is finding a partner. I know everybody loves to trade down in all their mock drafts and in imaganation land, but it's just not that easy. Especially with the third pick in the draft.
I would trade down to #32 if I could this year. Say, 10 to 17 to 25 to 32. Of course its not that easy, but def. not impossible.Buy land in AK now. In ten years due to global warming, it will be the new tropical paradise, minus the tropics
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by AkhippoIt may not be magic, but as the Pats find out every friggin year, you just have to be willing. They not only trade once, they do it multiple times a draft. We just have to be open.
I would trade down to #32 if I could this year. Say, 10 to 17 to 25 to 32. Of course its not that easy, but def. not impossible.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by BuffaloBlitz83If buffalo really likes one of the QB's. Are you against a trade down to grab extra picks. We do have many holes.
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by BangarangOnce there is a rookie wage scale, trading down won't be as difficult. However, until then, it will be tough finding another team willing to take on the #3 pick given how much money they'll have to pay.
That's what would attract a trade up to our spot and QB's get paid no matter what. You think Snyder and the QB desperate Redskins care how much they have to pay one ?Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by Night TrainNot if it's a QB.
That's what would attract a trade up to our spot and QB's get paid no matter what. You think Snyder and the QB desperate Redskins care how much they have to pay one ?
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by madnessNo thank you. I'm not interested in trading down at #3.
If for example The Skins moved up from #10 to #3, we'd back up to #10 and also receive an extra 2nd & 3rd. ( if they had those picks.. but it's just an example ) The value chart would indeed bring that much.
Don't forget the Pats with all those extra picks. Bills have an extra 4th and then could have 2 picks in each of the first 4 rounds. It's no stretch.
Don't we have multiple needs ? If so, you pick up that phone 10 out of 10 times.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by Night TrainCould I ask you who you see as that special blue chip player at #3 ? Not arguing the point but the trade value chart shows pick #3 is worth 2200 points.
If for example The Skins moved up from #10 to #3, we'd back up to #10 and also receive an extra 2nd & 3rd. ( if they had those picks.. but it's just an example ) The value chart would indeed bring that much.
Don't forget the Pats with all those extra picks. Bills have an extra 4th and then could have 2 picks in each of the first 4 rounds. It's no stretch.
Don't we have multiple needs ? If so, you pick up that phone 10 out of 10 times.
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by madnessI'd be happy with Peterson, Green or Dareus at 3. We aren't trying to restock talent like the Patriots (who miss more than they hit with all those extra picks). We are trying to get actual talent. This mess of a team doesn't get fixed in a single off-season and deluding the talent for the sake of adding bodies doesn't help at all in the big picture.
Comment
-
-
Re: Against a trade down?
Originally posted by madnessI'd be happy with Peterson, Green or Dareus at 3. We aren't trying to restock talent like the Patriots (who miss more than they hit with all those extra picks). We are trying to get actual talent. This mess of a team doesn't get fixed in a single off-season and deluding the talent for the sake of adding bodies doesn't help at all in the big picture.
5 picks means 2 good players
10 picks means 4 good players.
Still crappy drafting, but 2 more good players.
If you could break out of the 3 position this year, move all the way to the bottom; You could turn Dareus/Martez Wilson/Kaepernick into Phil Taylor/Martez Wilson/Kyle Rudolph/An OT/KaepernickBuy land in AK now. In ten years due to global warming, it will be the new tropical paradise, minus the tropics
-
👍 2
Comment
-
Comment