If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
is it just me or would anyone else rather draft a Stanzi, McElroy, or Taylor in the 4th or later.
There are so many flaws with the top guys and they will take so much time to develop, why not take one of these three and develop them.
If we are going to have to develop them anyway I would rather draft players in the first three rounds and then projects after that.
Trouble is, the guys you mentioned will probably never develop into anything but clipboard holders. At least the better guys have a chance to develop into starters.
But I'm all for drafting D in the first several rounds, and leaving Fitz at the helm for another season.
Should have known, way back in 1960 when we drafted Richie Lucas Number 1, that this would be a long, hard ride. But who could have known it would be THIS bad?
Trouble is, the guys you mentioned will probably never develop into anything but clipboard holders. At least the better guys have a chance to develop into starters.
But I'm all for drafting D in the first several rounds, and leaving Fitz at the helm for another season.
Well I think what he is saying is that he'd rather take a flyer on a late Round QB and let Fitz play the season as opposed to drafting Newton or Gabbert.
I keep saying, Gabbert and Newton just happen to be the best QBs in the draft, but that doesnt mean they are any of the best players. QBs are important obviously, but just because they are the BEST QB's doesnt mean they are the best players in the draft, and I think this is something we should never do. It is basically reaching. Newton I could see because of his tremendous ceiling, but Gabbert was a 2nd rounder until Luck decided to stay in school...no one should jump into the top 10 from the 2nd round just because another player doesnt declare.
Tweet
Comment