If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
"Only conditionally?" To me, the definition of "conditionally" is : Imposing, depending on, or containing a condition.
So, if they agreed to the deal conditionally, then that tells me that they agreed to it, with otehr conditions... Meaning they really didn't agree to it at all, they want other things added...
Maybe it's me, but "conditionally" doesn't sound like they've agreed to it... Unless other conditions are met.
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Originally posted by BLeonard
"Only conditionally?" To me, the definition of "conditionally" is : Imposing, depending on, or containing a condition.
So, if they agreed to the deal conditionally, then that tells me that they agreed to it, with otehr conditions... Meaning they really didn't agree to it at all, they want other things added...
Maybe it's me, but "conditionally" doesn't sound like they've agreed to it... Unless other conditions are met.
-Bill
I think it means this:
They have agreed to the current deal which is not finished but reserve the right to vote against it if the final details don't meet their approval.
It's a fancy way of saying we realize we aren't totally done but we agree to everything so far and feel the rest won't hold up a final deal... It's a way to move forward when you have some final legal language to get done still.
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Breer just stated that the "conditional" piece was around a successful settlement which will likely come after the Exec committee recommends this deal.
It just gives the player plaintiffs a chance to have their day in court if they feel they are screwed by this deal.
I really don't see any current plaintiff holding this up. But, it does mean that the deal is tentative until there is a settlement on all the law suits... which we really knew anyway.
Translation: Step #1, a major step, is complete but we still have other steps which must occur before were back to football.
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
After weeks of following this it appears to me that the next steps, in order, are:
1a) Settle all current cases between players and NFL
1b) Owners vote to pass CBA
2) Players become a union again
3) Deal is complete
4) Lockout is lifted
5) New league year starts
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Originally posted by BLeonard
"Only conditionally?" To me, the definition of "conditionally" is : Imposing, depending on, or containing a condition.
So, if they agreed to the deal conditionally, then that tells me that they agreed to it, with otehr conditions... Meaning they really didn't agree to it at all, they want other things added...
Maybe it's me, but "conditionally" doesn't sound like they've agreed to it... Unless other conditions are met.
-Bill
The resolution to the lawsuits are the condition from what I'm hearing. They've given their guys at the top more power to close a deal, and there is one in place. I'm thinking the Owners will probably follow suit in not voting in favor of the the deal until they know the outcome of the resolution, granting more power to league execs. to close the deal. But that's my opinion based on what I'm reading and hearing.
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
We are still probably looking at another 2 weeks, 3 at the most before the lockout is finally put to bed, but the end to this is definitely in sight. JMO
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Originally posted by Extremebillsfan247
We are still probably looking at another 2 weeks, 3 at the most before the lockout is finally put to bed, but the end to this is definitely in sight. JMO
The lockout will be lifted by weeks end or by Tuesday at the latest IMO. But the league will not open for business until sometime next week.
No way they cancel or even postpone the HOF game. Just my opinion.
I think the media is way over analyzing right now. The deal is acceptable to the players at this point. Yes, they still have to settle cases, reconstitute, etc... but it's procedural since the deal is accepted by the players.
Like anything else, if someone wants to wait until the deal is finally done, fine. But, this was the first major step.
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Originally posted by SquishDaFish
There is no way in hell its going to go 2-3 weeks. This will be over and business will reopen by wed next week.
I hope your right. But as X-Era points out, its all procedural now. The questions are how long will those procedures take to finalize, and how long will it take to settle the lawsuits that are still unresolved? I don't see these 2 events running concurrently since one needs to be resolved to finalize the other. The settlement of the lawsuits from the legal end are what will cause this thing to drag its feet.
On a side note: I've just read that both Players, and Owners plan to vote tomorrow. So we will see how it goes. But apparently the Owners are ready to vote with or with out the players.
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Eisen throwing water in that pessimistic douche LaCanfora's face... Love it. Now LaCanfora is back tracking and admitting that the CBA is pretty much done. It's the legal cases. Yes they are real hurdles but they are steps and the big one is agreeing on the CBA which is pretty much done.
Re: Rumor: Players have voted to pass the CBA... conditionally
Originally posted by Extremebillsfan247
I hope your right. But as X-Era points out, its all procedural now. The questions are how long will those procedures take to finalize, and how long will it take to settle the lawsuits that are still unresolved? I don't see these 2 events running concurrently since one needs to be resolved to finalize the other. The settlement of the lawsuits from the legal end are what will cause this thing to drag its feet.
I've just read that both Players, and Owners plan to vote tomorrow. So we will see how it goes. But apparently the Owners are ready to vote with or with out the players.
That's it. In that situation, Brady and a few players won't hold up a deal and starting the season. Yes, the process steps may take time but everyone wants to get to work. There isn't anyone other than the lawyers holding things up. And we know that both the Owners and Players have squashed the lawyers when they get in the way.
Put it this way, the CBA will get voted on tomorrow by both sides. It may still be tangled into the legal cases, but the deal will be approved. The sides are agreeing to the details of the CBA, the legal cases are really a separate issue.
Comment