If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Re: Adam Schecter's top two teams for taking Pryor
1. I dont believe Schefter on much draft stuff, he's very good as an insider, but his draft info has been hit and miss.
2. Yesterday (if you follow me, hint, hint) you would of seen who the confirmed teams are with interest in Pryor per Rob Rang of CBS Sports and NFL Draft Scout. The Bills were not listed in that group.
I think Buffalo could have interest but at this time I dont believe Schefter is correct in thinking Buffalo is one of the top suitors. I know Miami is interested and I know of at least one other team who is high on him.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Re: Adam Schecter's top two teams for taking Pryor
I want to remind some of you to put a guy on the PS he has to first be made available to every team. So why burn a draft pick on a guy and risk possibly losing him just days after taking him?
Imo you take any player he goes on the 53 man roster, in Pryor's case he would almost never be active, but you don't try and sneak him onto the PS.
COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Re: Adam Schecter's top two teams for taking Pryor
Originally posted by DraftBoy
I want to remind some of you to put a guy on the PS he has to first be made available to every team. So why burn a draft pick on a guy and risk possibly losing him just days after taking him?
Imo you take any player he goes on the 53 man roster, in Pryor's case he would almost never be active, but you don't try and sneak him onto the PS.
Exactly. But then we'd be carrying 4 QBs on the 53 man roster.
Re: Adam Schecter's top two teams for taking Pryor
Didnt see the ESPN clip.
Was Schefter just speculating or did he actually hear this from reliable sources? I know both ESPN and NFL Network sometimes just inquire with Schefter his opinions on certain things and was wondering if this was the case this time as well?
Re: Adam Schecter's top two teams for taking Pryor
This kind of speculation is garbage. You look down the list of teams that need QB's and pick the first 2 on the list. I doubt he has any inside info on this.
Pryor is a project that is a long shot to make it as a starting NFL QB. He makes Cam Newton look like Tom Brady accuracy wise but he does have size and athletism. I'm not sure he gets selected before the 6th round.
Re: Adam Schecter's top two teams for taking Pryor
Pryor as a 5th, 6th, or 7th round pick, if he's willing to work as a wide receiver, wouldn't be a terrible risk --- assuming he'd be willing to switch positions. I don't think at this point, he wants to do that.
He's tall, athletic and really fast. It's a longshot -- but you need to get lucky with a 5,6, or 7.
Tweet
Comment