Looking at the defense they do absolutely nothing to confuse the offense and thats the objective rookie one at that y do they give every quarter respect. when they didn't blitz Tom Brady i understood y veteran qb he ll eat u up but a rookie come on u gotta blitz him from his blindside man, even tho our corners got burnt not all there fault they were covering to long and yes Fitz was off but Bengals weren't specular our defense made them look that way with giving time to throw getting big plays. up 14 and halftime 3rd quarter 2 quick big plays. Watching the Baltimore and even the jets they were doing creative blitzes throwing each other off and we cant even shake up a rookie qb that is all Edwards. we could've won the game if our defense showed up offense is not always gonna b there they were there for 3 weeks y do we have Dave wann for. gotta take chances and they don't play to conservative and we still give up big plays. Edwards got to take chances he cant use that we don't have the players excess anymore we got the talent to do so start using them. That base defense is not gonna work if they know that your bringing it.
G. Edwards
Collapse
X
-
Re: G. Edwards
Yeah I'm souring on Edwards as our DC... after 4 weeks and were giving up huge yards...
I was willing to look past Oakland and NE... but after this weekend it's time to start call out the head guy calling the D plays the D scheme and the D game-plan
Comment
-
-
Re: G. Edwards
Originally posted by Maximillino i would stay at 3-4 more speed and thats what we r built for
Comment
-
-
Re: G. Edwards
What I'm concerned with is that our defensive front 7 is still struggling. I don't know whether to point blame at George Edwards for that or his assistants. We went out and got Wannstedt but I'm just not seeing the improvement with our LB core. They don't even know what to do with Moats. Even in our wins, this defense has struggled. It is concerning. I agree that something has to give here. Either Edward's job should be in jeopardy, or somebody from his staff has to answer for that. JMO
Comment
-
-
Re: G. Edwards
Originally posted by BangarangOne could argue that we're built more for a 4-3 at this point. We're basically using Dareus and Williams as our penetrating (or lack there of at this point) DTs. Kelsay should never have his hand off of the ground. Even Barnett was an All Pro as a MLB in a 4-3.
I thinks we r built for 3-4 everybody that played on the line beefed up to 300 lbs like carrington we r buiilt for 3-4 and we ll have speed kelsay playing much better standing up
Comment
-
-
Re: G. Edwards
Originally posted by MaximilliI thinks we r built for 3-4 everybody that played on the line beefed up to 300 lbs like carrington we r buiilt for 3-4 and we ll have speed kelsay playing much better standing up
Comment
-
-
Re: G. Edwards
Originally posted by DujekWanny will be DC for the start of the 2012 season.COMING SOON...
Originally posted by Dr.LecterWe were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!
Comment
-
Comment