If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
Just as a side note... it should have never come down to this one call. The Bills lost this game on several other levels. It's simply a closer look at this call, that was indeed pivotal in the game.
YE OLE is blogging about the Bills, come visit. It's a good time, gents!
the ref saw clements glove. at normal speed the pink glove looks looks like the lighter highlight of sunlight shining off ball and its moving, prompting the ref to think the ball was shifting. on slow-mo replay you can clearly make out the brown of the ball against the glove, and see that the ball definitely is not moving, which does and should conclusively prove he did catch it. how somebody could watch that replay and not see a clear reversal is unexplainable. shazam!
"Remember, this was ruled a catch, until the back judge ran in and called this incomplete on the field. What did he see? Upon review, the call on the field was upheld, but with no explanation. What is your take? This looks like a catch to us."
I didn't think it was, but saw that bolded part and made a rash post without thinking
I think the biggest indicator was Stevie getting up so quickly and Jackson I think too it was, they were both sure he caught it and told Gailey to challenge, I believe the announcers said.
The Refs have been terrible this year, they played into the outcome of a few games this weekend. Have they stopped calling holding on the O-Linemen ? It's time to get full time Officials and get rid of these old men.
Stevie called out the back judge on more than his catch. His reply is in my sig.
Exactly the buck didn't start or stop with that play. It was happening all day. Most drives had a questionable call or non call that forced 3 and outs.
This was a very bad week for refs. I am not saying there is a conspiracy theory but it does look peculiar that large market teams and teams with a large fan base get the calls that help them such as Green Bay and Pittsburgh.
The calls against Buffalo helps New England and the Jets. The Giants had a call at end of game that helped them. The Bears had a call go their way against Panthers that turned out to be very costly as well (Shockey got called for offensive pass interference on a TD catch when replays show that Shockey did not push off at all and just had a hand on the defender For a brief moment which happens literally almost every play. The Panthers drive ended up with a blocked FG and they lost by 5. Rodgers had a play reversed when he was initially was ruled down before going into end zone. GB challenged he was not down before entering end zone but the ref reversed it and called it a TD. I freeze framed my DVR and his knee hit ground clearly before going into end zone.
This just tells me money talks and it appears the league does not want fair play but wants the teams that can generate the most revenue to be in the playoffs.
Comment