How much longer is this bum going to be out? I thought he was initially supposed to miss "a few weeks" I was thinking he should have been cut because he seems to always be hurt. With how bad Mckevlin is, we need Mcgee back and healthy. Keep Mckelvin as the nickle and Mcgee back to the starting position. Does anybody have a time table for Mcgee's injury?
Terrence Mcgee
Collapse
X
-
Re: Terrence Mcgee
Originally posted by HurkeyNutsHow much longer is this bum going to be out? I thought he was initially supposed to miss "a few weeks" I was thinking he should have been cut because he seems to always be hurt. With how bad Mckevlin is, we need Mcgee back and healthy. Keep Mckelvin as the nickle and Mcgee back to the starting position. Does anybody have a time table for Mcgee's injury?
can you please explain if you like or dislike McGee???? In your first sentence he's a bum, but later in your rant we need him back and healthy.....
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Terrence Mcgee
I think he is always hurt. Therefore, in my opinion, he's a bum that gets paid to sit on the bench all the time. Although he is a bum, he would still be better than burnt mctoast.Last edited by BertSquirtgum; 10-04-2011, 09:10 PM.
Comment
-
-
Re: Terrence Mcgee
McKelvin and McGee both have excellent speed as cornerbacks, but as has been mentionedMcKelvin lacks awareness of the ball. He can stay with Jackson. What happens when the ball comes is another story. Green is a very talented receiver for Cincinnati who uses his height really well. McKelvin didn't handle him well at all. Jackson, however is something of a smurf. Lacking the height advantage may make it harder for him to snatch the ball out of the air when McKelvin is with him stride for stride. That's not much to grasp on to, but maybe it'll mean McKelvin does a bit better.I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.
I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.
Comment
-
Comment