should arthur moats be a starter to help spark pass rush?

[NOT THE DUDE...]

arthur moats as a starter? i puked when johnson was starting vs the giants...:air:

and dont tell me hes to small. hes 6-1 250, thats fine...

[RoscoeMagic]

He doesn't need to start, but he needs snaps. He can rush the passer. I want to see him on the field in pass rush situations and bring the heat! He won't start over Merriman or Kelsay and doesn't really need to in order to make an impact IMO.

[Bangarang]

No. He's not that good.

[Joe Fo Sho]

He's too small.

[Maximilli]

Na just put him in on 3rd down

[psubills62]

He started against the Giants, didn't exactly spark much.

[BillsFanCupp38]

It's so obvious he is a natural pass rusher... It's what he did in college and he has been effective at it since he got to the pros...

[Buffalo Thriller]

Yeah, I dont see how he is too small.

[EDS]

Can he stop the run? If not he has no business being in on first down.

[NOT THE DUDE...]

He started against the Giants, didn't exactly spark much.

no johnson did

[psubills62]

no johnson did
Well starter or not, he still got a lot more time than normal and the pass rush looked even worse than normal.

[stuckincincy]

If Kelsay and Merriman are still iffy after the bye, their choices are limited.

What's lost if Moats plays? The collective effort of the defensive personnel hasn't exactly shined, starters or not. :nervous:

Well - they leaped face first into a 3-4 without that you-can't-move-me-out-of-the-way NT, and several drafts of plucking this or that db instead of linebackers.

Now the cry is for more dbs... :birds:

[Ed]

I'd rather see Moats starting then Batten.

[Beebe]

Yes I think we should start him, and start blitzing more we are getting beat with big plays so let are corners cover more 1 on 1 and we will get more sacks and more pressure to the QB's, and yes im tired to of watching QB's have all day to throw on us.