View Full Version : so, what is conclusive proof anymore
chernobylwraiths
11-06-2011, 01:26 PM
That ball that Wilson "intercepted" sure looked like his hand was underneath the ball. But conclusively it was overturned while Stevie Johnson had a catch a few weeks ago that looked conclusively like a catch wasn't.
I don't think Wilson really had it, but it sure didn't look like it was conclusively not a catch. It sure looked like his hand was underneath the whole time.
And what's with the Jets getting an extra yard on virtually every offensive play?
NOT THE DUDE...
11-06-2011, 01:28 PM
conspiracy...
Worst call since the Stevie catch. HACKuli handed them 3 points.
YardRat
11-06-2011, 01:31 PM
Bad call IMO, unless I see another angle that proves otherwise.
Lone Stranger
11-06-2011, 01:32 PM
The call should not have been overturned, however, the Jets earned at least 3 points. They have been totally dominant.
The call should not have been overturned, however, the Jets earned at least 3 points. They have been totally dominant.
They didn't earn anything, while they have been able to move the ball the D has done what it has done all year, bend but doesn't break and takes the ball away. You don't deserve anything in this game. Especially not 3 points from the zebras.
Philagape
11-06-2011, 01:46 PM
All the Jets have earned is turnovers. Anything else was given to them
northernbillfan
11-06-2011, 02:29 PM
Same thing just happened with the spot that should have been first down.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.0 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.