so, what is conclusive proof anymore

[chernobylwraiths]

That ball that Wilson "intercepted" sure looked like his hand was underneath the ball. But conclusively it was overturned while Stevie Johnson had a catch a few weeks ago that looked conclusively like a catch wasn't.

I don't think Wilson really had it, but it sure didn't look like it was conclusively not a catch. It sure looked like his hand was underneath the whole time.

And what's with the Jets getting an extra yard on virtually every offensive play?

[NOT THE DUDE...]

Re: so, what is conclusive proof anymore

conspiracy...

[zone]

Re: so, what is conclusive proof anymore

Worst call since the Stevie catch. HACKuli handed them 3 points.

[YardRat]

Re: so, what is conclusive proof anymore

Bad call IMO, unless I see another angle that proves otherwise.

[Lone Stranger]

Re: so, what is conclusive proof anymore

The call should not have been overturned, however, the Jets earned at least 3 points. They have been totally dominant.

[zone]

Re: so, what is conclusive proof anymore

The call should not have been overturned, however, the Jets earned at least 3 points. They have been totally dominant.

They didn't earn anything, while they have been able to move the ball the D has done what it has done all year, bend but doesn't break and takes the ball away. You don't deserve anything in this game. Especially not 3 points from the zebras.

[Philagape]

Re: so, what is conclusive proof anymore

All the Jets have earned is turnovers. Anything else was given to them

[northernbillfan]

Re: so, what is conclusive proof anymore

Same thing just happened with the spot that should have been first down.