That Specer Johnson Int....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Thief
    Registered User
    • Sep 2009
    • 820

    That Specer Johnson Int....

    How was that not a forced fumble by Kelsey? Tebows are was clearly not moving forward. WTF.
  • OpIv37
    Acid Douching Asswipe
    • Sep 2002
    • 101326

    #2
    Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

    Who cares?

    We got the TD and it makes Tebow's stats look even more embarrassing.

    It's win-win.
    MiKiDo Facebook
    MiKiDo Website

    Comment

    • Thief
      Registered User
      • Sep 2009
      • 820

      #3
      Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

      Who cares? Chris Kelsey, Im sure. It would just be nice for the sake of accuracy.

      Comment

      • gonzo1105
        Registered User
        • Jul 2002
        • 776

        #4
        Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

        Because to be considered a fumble it has to hit the ground. Just like the John Beck when he played for the dolphins. The ball slipped out of his hand and wilson caught it out of the air for the Td

        Comment

        • Meathead
          Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
          • Jul 2002
          • 21349

          #5
          Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

          it matters cuz it was make an awesome day by the white boy even more awesome

          and it certainly does not have to hit the ground to be a fumble
          One set of rules for all in the beloved community

          Comment

          • Thief
            Registered User
            • Sep 2009
            • 820

            #6
            Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

            Gonzo, that is not true at all. A fumble does not have to hit the ground. Worth mentioning I am a ref. Plain and simple, his arm was moving back when Kelsey knocked it loose. That makes it a fumble. If Spencer didnt catch it, and they blew it dead, we would all be screaming wtf.

            Comment

            • Thief
              Registered User
              • Sep 2009
              • 820

              #7
              Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

              It would give Kelsey 3 sacks on the day and a forced fumble!

              Comment

              • naugem
                Registered User
                • Mar 2004
                • 164

                #8
                Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

                Originally posted by Thief
                How was that not a forced fumble by Kelsey? Tebows are was clearly not moving forward. WTF.
                I thought so too...

                Comment

                • gonzo1105
                  Registered User
                  • Jul 2002
                  • 776

                  #9
                  Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

                  Originally posted by Thief
                  Gonzo, that is not true at all. A fumble does not have to hit the ground. Worth mentioning I am a ref. Plain and simple, his arm was moving back when Kelsey knocked it loose. That makes it a fumble. If Spencer didnt catch it, and they blew it dead, we would all be screaming wtf.
                  Actually im quite right, pg 51 of the nfl rulebook states that a completed or intercepted pass is defined when a pass is either caught or intercepted if a) secures the ball in his hands or arms before the ball touches the ground B) the player has both feet or any other part of the body besides the hands and C) performs an act that is typical nfl movement( paraphrased).

                  Also defined is a Forward pass in the NFL rule book: A forward pass is defined by the ball initially moving forward after the ball leaves the passers hand. The ball that Johnson intercepted was going towards the bills endzone. It wasn't much maybe a yard or two but it was going forward. So combine the Ball going forward and Johnson catching it before it hits the ground and you have an interception.

                  I was wrong on the Beck thing though. Since Beck lost the ball behind him it is considered a lateral and thus a fumble recovery for a Touchdown even though Wilson caught it.

                  This goes for both a completed and intercepted pass so if tebow got hit ball hits the ground its a fumble but because the ball was caught out of the air it is ruled an interception. Thus if a denver o lineman had caught it it would have been recorded as a completion.

                  Confusing I know but its the way the rules are defined. If you would like to check out the NFL rulebook here is the link:

                  Last edited by gonzo1105; 12-25-2011, 03:14 PM.

                  Comment

                  • Thief
                    Registered User
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 820

                    #10
                    Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

                    Originally posted by gonzo1105
                    Actually im quite right, pg 51 of the nfl rulebook states that a completed or intercepted pass is defined when a pass is either caught or intercepted if a) secures the ball in his hands or arms before the ball touches the ground B) the player has both feet or any other part of the body besides the hands and C) performs an act that is typical nfl movement( paraphrased).

                    Also defined is a Forward pass in the NFL rule book: A forward pass is defined by the ball initially moving forward after the ball leaves the passers hand. The ball that Johnson intercepted was going towards the bills endzone. It wasn't much maybe a yard or two but it was going forward. So combine the Ball going forward and Johnson catching it before it hits the ground and you have an interception.

                    I was wrong on the Beck thing though. Since Beck lost the ball behind him it is considered a lateral and thus a fumble recovery for a Touchdown even though Wilson caught it.

                    This goes for both a completed and intercepted pass so if tebow got hit ball hits the ground its a fumble but because the ball was caught out of the air it is ruled an interception. Thus if a denver o lineman had caught it it would have been recorded as a completion.

                    Confusing I know but its the way the rules are defined. If you would like to check out the NFL rulebook here is the link:

                    http://static.nfl.com/static/content..._Rule_Book.pdf
                    All Null in void, his arm was not moving forward when he lost control, it was moving backword. Thus it was not a pass. You can fumble forward, and a fumble can be caught in the air.

                    Comment

                    • Oaf
                      Do you read what you write?
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 6151

                      #11
                      Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

                      Originally posted by gonzo1105
                      Because to be considered a fumble it has to hit the ground. Just like the John Beck when he played for the dolphins. The ball slipped out of his hand and wilson caught it out of the air for the Td
                      That was actually considered a FUM TD.

                      Comment

                      • gonzo1105
                        Registered User
                        • Jul 2002
                        • 776

                        #12
                        Re: That Specer Johnson Int....

                        Originally posted by Oaf
                        That was actually considered a FUM TD.

                        Read the above post where I admit I was wrong about Beck

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X