I'm just as frustrated as everyone with our team. I understand that the QB position is THE main position, and without an elite thrower, you're not going far. HOWEVER, currently there are 6 QBs in the NFL with SuperBowl rings. 6/32 teams. That equals 18% of teams in the league have a SB winning QB leading their team. Currently 1 of those QBs is injured. So 5/32.
So when we talk about QBs being good enough, are we just talking about their potential, or are we looking at their stats/win/losses? Are we looking at if they've won a SB before? Or are we looking into the future of what might be?
What QBs are better than Fitz?
Brady
Rothlesberger
Manning 1
Manning 2
Brees
Rodgers
Obviously, those QB's are better than Fitz. Those are the only ones in the NFL w/ SB rings.
I'll add the following QBs EVEN THO they've never won a SB, or even been to the SB, or even sniffed a SB as better than Fitz:
Rivers (absolutely)
Vick (maybe)
Shaub (maybe)
C. Newton (maybe) too soon to tell
Alex Smith (maybe) 1 good year
Romo (maybe)
Sam Bradford (?????)
The following QBs I would say Fitz is equal to or better:
Flacco - What if the Bills had the Ravens D this year?
Dalton - too soon to tell. What if the Bills had the Bengals D this year?
Fitz is better than:
Sanchez
Moore
McCoy
Freeman
Hasselback
the rest?
Since only 6 QBs in the league have won SBs, are you saying that if Rivers, Vick, Shaub, Newton, Smith, Romo, Bradford, or whoever was a BUFFALO Bill, we'd win a SuperBowl...even tho they've never won a SB with their team?
If winning a SB is the only thing that matters, how is Fitz any different than Rivers, Vick, Shaub, Romo, or any of the 27 QBs in the NFL who have not won a SB?
so what is the criteria of evaluating a QB for our team?
So when we talk about QBs being good enough, are we just talking about their potential, or are we looking at their stats/win/losses? Are we looking at if they've won a SB before? Or are we looking into the future of what might be?
What QBs are better than Fitz?
Brady
Rothlesberger
Manning 1
Manning 2
Brees
Rodgers
Obviously, those QB's are better than Fitz. Those are the only ones in the NFL w/ SB rings.
I'll add the following QBs EVEN THO they've never won a SB, or even been to the SB, or even sniffed a SB as better than Fitz:
Rivers (absolutely)
Vick (maybe)
Shaub (maybe)
C. Newton (maybe) too soon to tell
Alex Smith (maybe) 1 good year
Romo (maybe)
Sam Bradford (?????)
The following QBs I would say Fitz is equal to or better:
Flacco - What if the Bills had the Ravens D this year?
Dalton - too soon to tell. What if the Bills had the Bengals D this year?
Fitz is better than:
Sanchez
Moore
McCoy
Freeman
Hasselback
the rest?
Since only 6 QBs in the league have won SBs, are you saying that if Rivers, Vick, Shaub, Newton, Smith, Romo, Bradford, or whoever was a BUFFALO Bill, we'd win a SuperBowl...even tho they've never won a SB with their team?
If winning a SB is the only thing that matters, how is Fitz any different than Rivers, Vick, Shaub, Romo, or any of the 27 QBs in the NFL who have not won a SB?
so what is the criteria of evaluating a QB for our team?
Comment