I have to post this

[Cali512]

http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2012/02/23/ranking-the-2011-offensive-lines-part-2/

DE 1st round, WR 2nd, 4-3OLB 3rd

[Cali512]

Re: I have to post this

I understand the Offense we run. But either way, thats one helluva nice stat. Not only that but, run 12th, pass rank 2nd.

[stuckincincy]

Re: I have to post this

I understand the Offense we run. But either way, thats one helluva nice stat. Not only that but, run 12th, pass rank 2nd.

Pyrrhic victory.

12th season out of the money.

[Cali512]

Re: I have to post this

Dinky-dink, quick short pass game...how hard is it to block for two seconds?

I was waiting for this. If our passing game really took 2 seconds, then how did our QB get nearly 4000 yards and if our WRs outside of Johnson are so bad, how did they get open in less than 2 seconds?

[stuckincincy]

Re: I have to post this

I was waiting for this. If our passing game really took 2 seconds, then how did our QB get nearly 4000 yards and if our WRs outside of Johnson are so bad, how did they get open in less than 2 seconds?

The great line play forged the way to a mighty 6 and 10 record.

NFL 2010+ rules - players who in years past wouldn't make a cut, now gain 1,000+ yards receiving.

[JCBills]

Re: I have to post this

http://www.profootballfocus.com/blog...-lines-part-2/


DE 1st round, WR 2nd, 4-3OLB 3rd

I'd say flip WR and OLB.

[Cali512]

Re: I have to post this

You are right. The great line play forged the way to a mighty 6 and 10 record. So it was a big plus.

This is NFL 2011 - players who in years past wouldn't make a cut, now gain 1,000+ yards receiving.

The Giants were 31st ranked dumbass. Record doesnt matter, so Jackson and Spiller suck bc we only were 6-10?

[Cali512]

Re: I have to post this

I'd say flip WR and OLB.

Its not that hard to find a decent OLB on a 4-3 team. It will be pretty tough to find a starting WR in the 3rd. I give you if its the small Parrish type of WR, id say the 3rd and OLB in 2nd. But if we are lookin for the big strong catch when hes not open, id rather find one in the 2nd, and test my luck with a OLB in 3rd

[stuckincincy]

Re: I have to post this

The Giants were 31st ranked dumbass. Record doesnt matter, so Jackson and Spiller suck bc we only were 6-10?

Calm down, Cali.

Your support of players is noted, appreciated, but at the end of the day, it is the record that matters.


Pax.

[ddaryl]

Re: I have to post this

If we can upgrade our OT position and have better depth with Bell and Hairston then I am all for it. We can get better on the OL, and I would not be upset if we took an OT in round #1

Much of our late season O woes did come down to lack of depth on the OL, and not having any real legitimate #2 WR threats, as well as our D giving up 30+ points way to often, and forcing our O to take chances just ot stay in games

[alohabillsfan]

Re: I have to post this

Id say wait till after FA, De wont be a need after the Bills sign De's Mathis and Mario! OK, Nap times over....

[stuckincincy]

Re: I have to post this

If we can upgrade our OT position and have better depth with Bell and Hairston then I am all for it. We can get better on the OL, and I would not be upset if we took an OT in round #1

Much of our late season O woes did come down to lack of depth on the OL, and not having any real legitimate #2 WR threats, as well as our D giving up 30+ points way to often, and forcing our O to take chances just ot stay in games

Never wrong to roll the dice for a OL, IMO.

I'm with you re a #2. The rules changes dictate passes - we've all seen the rise of TEs and certainly seen the Bills getting burned by TEs - they are not alone - I see the same thing here in CIN.

I'm wondering if nowdays, a team with wr needs might be better served by a sure-handed "traditional" #2, over a speedy "1."

[JCBills]

Re: I have to post this

Its not that hard to find a decent OLB on a 4-3 team. It will be pretty tough to find a starting WR in the 3rd. I give you if its the small Parrish type of WR, id say the 3rd and OLB in 2nd. But if we are lookin for the big strong catch when hes not open, id rather find one in the 2nd, and test my luck with a OLB in 3rd

It is very hard to find a decent OLB on a 4-3 team.

If it wasn't Keith Ellison wouldn't have been starting.

This is a deep WR class with big bodies all the way through.

This is also a good OLB class, but the top end talent is freakish. Guys like Zach Brown, Nigel Bradham, and Lavonte David look like playmakers.

[stuckincincy]

Re: I have to post this

It is very hard to find a decent OLB on a 4-3 team.

If it wasn't Keith Ellison wouldn't have been starting.

This is a deep WR class with big bodies all the way through.

This is also a good OLB class, but the top end talent is freakish. Guys like Zach Brown, Nigel Bradham, and Lavonte David look like playmakers.

I wonder how Ellison is doing these days?

Faults and features, the Bills got their money's worth out of the 6th rounder. IMO, he gave 'em what he had to the best of his ability.

I wish him well.

[better days]

Re: I have to post this

If we can upgrade our OT position and have better depth with Bell and Hairston then I am all for it. We can get better on the OL, and I would not be upset if we took an OT in round #1

Much of our late season O woes did come down to lack of depth on the OL, and not having any real legitimate #2 WR threats, as well as our D giving up 30+ points way to often, and forcing our O to take chances just ot stay in games

Well, I would HATE an OT at #10 DEFENSE DEFENSE DEFENSE that is what the Bills need far more than anything.