Saints OG Carl Nicks

[BuffaloBlitz83]

Would be a Big upgrade. He is expected to leave in free agency. He wasnt franchised.

[The Jokeman]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

Would be a Big upgrade. He is expected to leave in free agency. He wasnt franchised.

One position we're actually strong at is OG. No thanks on Nicks.

[Goobylal]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

One position we're actually strong at is OG. No thanks on Nicks.

Yeah. Nicks wants to be the highest-paid OG in the NFL. Not worth it for the Bills.

[BertSquirtgum]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

dumb

[tampabay25690]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

dumb

I will say u have the best avatar and signature on the BZ...

[ddaryl]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

If we added Carl it would not be a dumb move, but it would be predicated on probably moving Levitre to LT permanently which probably isn't the best idea. That would be probably cheaper then trying to sign back Gaither or Bell as LT's who will probaby be overpaid

Levitre Nicks Woods Urbik Pears. Would Levitre be good enough ? Probably not his strength

I think Jackson and Spiller would have huge years running up the middle on that line

[Raptor]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

I've never understood this desire to move Levitre. He is one of the best G's in the game and is a avg at best LT. Leave him alone at LG

[ddaryl]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

I've never understood this desire to move Levitre. He is one of the best G's in the game and is a avg at best LT. Leave him alone at LG

I tend to agree... but last year they were desperate do to injuries. I cannot recall how well Levitre did at LT. I know he was at least adequate but can't tell you if he was good enough to be a great LT

[Philagape]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

If we added Carl it would not be a dumb move, but it would be predicated on probably moving Levitre to LT permanently which probably isn't the best idea. That would be probably cheaper then trying to sign back Gaither or Bell as LT's who will probaby be overpaid

Levitre Nicks Woods Urbik Pears. Would Levitre be good enough ? Probably not his strength

I think Jackson and Spiller would have huge years running up the middle on that line

Fred had a huge year behind the current interior when they were healthy.

There is no reason to pour big money into a guard when they have several much more dire needs.

[Ed]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

If Urbik and Rinehart return I think we're pretty set on the interior. Urbik provides decent depth at C and Rinehart can play either G position and played pretty well too. We'll probably use a draft pick for more depth too.

If we're going to spend big money on one player in free agency, there are a lot of other positions I'd want to pursue first before going for a G.

[YardRat]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

We need a back-up C that can swing to guard if necessary, not vice versa. Levitre needs to stay put at LG, and I don't care if the other four guys go down you still don't move him.

Creating two holes when you only have to fill one on an offensive line is just plain stupid.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

I think we're solid on the interior and don't really need Nicks.

What we need is depth not someone who's gonna be overpriced.

[YardRat]

Re: Saints OG Carl Nicks

We still need to at least tender Urbik and Rhinehart.