A good LB can be had in the 2nd round. Why pick one at 10, especially when he's not great?
LB
Collapse
X
-
Re: LB
Originally posted by Wagon CirclerAgreed. Picking kuechly at 10 would be the worst case scenario I think. I'd be very disappointed with the pick if that happened.
I am not worried at all that Nix would be so stupid to draft Kuechly at #10. If the Bills draft a LB at #10, it should be Ingram.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
Originally posted by jamze132Probably better than drafting a WR or a LT at #10. I'm not sold on Floyd, Rieff, or Martin that high in the draft.
A play maker WR that is BPA over a LB is a no brainer.. There is little doubt that we can use an upgrade to our WR corps
A solid OT on a team in need of OT's is also not a bad option, and arguably there is a LT worth the #10 pick...
However the best value at #10 appears to be WR and CBLast edited by ddaryl; 04-02-2012, 08:19 AM.
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
Originally posted by ddarylI really disagree.
A play maker WR that is BPA over a LB is a no brainer
A solid OT on a team in need of OT's is also not a bad option, and arguably there is a LT worth the #10 pick...
However the best value at #10 appears to be WR and CBAnonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
I would think anyone drafted in the second round is supposed to be good.
And all the feasible options at #10 have red flags that make them "not great."
It really is wide open there, which means the ideal scenario is to trade down. Get an extra pick and still draft a first-rounder at the same level as your original slot."It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther
"Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill
2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
Originally posted by ddarylI really disagree.
A play maker WR that is BPA over a LB is a no brainer.. There is little doubt that we can use an upgrade to our WR corps
A solid OT on a team in need of OT's is also not a bad option, and arguably there is a LT worth the #10 pick...
However the best value at #10 appears to be WR and CB"It is better to be divided by truth than to be united by error." -- Martin Luther
"Those who appease the crocodile will simply be eaten last." -- Winston Churchill
2003 BZ Pick Em Champion
2004 BZ Big Money League Champion
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
Originally posted by PhilagapeI would think anyone drafted in the second round is supposed to be good.
And all the feasible options at #10 have red flags that make them "not great."
It really is wide open there, which means the ideal scenario is to trade down. Get an extra pick and still draft a first-rounder at the same level as your original slot.
If it doesn't, just stick to your board.
Half the people will yell "value" or "reach" no matter who is selected.. but that's the norm. No real consensus, so many will feign outrage for the attention it garners them.
I'm sure many are already preparing their rant.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
Originally posted by better daysKuechly will not be the best player available at #10 & the Bills do not need INSIDE LB's which Kuechly is, they need OUTSIDE LB's.
I am not worried at all that Nix would be so stupid to draft Kuechly at #10. If the Bills draft a LB at #10, it should be Ingram.
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
Kueckly played OLB until his Soph year, when Mark Herzlich went down with Cancer and he took over the middle. He can play ANY LB position.
The few BC games I saw showed him dominating. Laugh at the people that wave a broad brush and compare him to Poz. He is NOTHING like Poz. Much faster, breaks early on the play, covers downfield. I wouldn't be upset at all if he was selected.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: LB
Originally posted by Night TrainKueckly played OLB until his Soph year, when Mark Herzlich went down with Cancer and he took over the middle. He can play ANY LB position.
The few BC games I saw showed him dominating. Laugh at the people that wave a broad brush and compare him to Poz. He is NOTHING like Poz. Much faster, breaks early on the play, covers downfield. I wouldn't be upset at all if he was selected.
Comment
-
Comment