So if Miami trades up to #3

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mr. Miyagi
    Lecter's Little Bitch

    • Sep 2002
    • 53616

    So if Miami trades up to #3

    So if Miami trades up to #3 to get Tannehill before Cleveland grabs him, should we trade up with Cleveland to get Kalil?

    I like Kalil a whole lot more than the other OTs and CBs. Maybe Floyd I'd be happy with at 10 but that's about it.
  • MitchMurrayDowntown
    Skoobasaurus-Rex
    • Oct 2011
    • 22284

    #2
    Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

    Originally posted by Mr. Miyagi
    So if Miami trades up to #3 to get Tannehill before Cleveland grabs him, should we trade up with Cleveland to get Kalil?

    I like Kalil a whole lot more than the other OTs and CBs. Maybe Floyd I'd be happy with at 10 but that's about it.
    Tannehill is more in demand than what has been printed, he's en fuego.

    Comment

    • CleveSteve
      Registered User
      • Apr 2011
      • 999

      #3
      Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

      It would be very expensive. The rams want Kalil too (allegedly) and the browns would much rather go to 6 than 10. The discussion would have to start with next year's first.

      Comment

      • DraftBoy
        Administrator
        • Jul 2002
        • 107452

        #4
        Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

        Originally posted by CleveSteve
        It would be very expensive. The rams want Kalil too (allegedly) and the browns would much rather go to 6 than 10. The discussion would have to start with next year's first.
        And moving next year's first is a non-starter for the Bills.
        COMING SOON...
        Originally posted by Dr.Lecter
        We were both drunk and Hillary did not look that bad at 2 AM, I swear!!!!!!

        Comment

        • MitchMurrayDowntown
          Skoobasaurus-Rex
          • Oct 2011
          • 22284

          #5
          Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

          Originally posted by CleveSteve
          It would be very expensive. The rams want Kalil too (allegedly) and the browns would much rather go to 6 than 10. The discussion would have to start with next year's first.
          Cheap draft picks (contract wise) versus the old system have a way of looking smart for a team without a QB, Miami is lost right now.

          Comment

          • clumping platelets

            #6
            Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

            If he falls to #5...........#10 and Fred Jackson for Kalil at #5


            Comment

            • clumping platelets

              #7
              Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

              Sign Ryan Grant

              Comment

              • clumping platelets

                #8
                Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                Comment

                • Night Train
                  Retired - On Several Levels
                  • Jul 2005
                  • 33117

                  #9
                  Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                  Kalil is rated the best of the LT prospects but is not worth trading up for.

                  Stay put or trade down, if an extra 2nd or 3rd can be aquired. We need players all over the place. Blinders off.
                  Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

                  Comment

                  • ThunderGun
                    Registered User
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 625

                    #10
                    Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                    Originally posted by clumping platelets
                    If he falls to #5...........#10 and Fred Jackson for Kalil at #5
                    No chance. It would take much more than that.

                    Comment

                    • ddaryl
                      Everything I post is sexual inuendo
                      • Jan 2005
                      • 10714

                      #11
                      Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                      I really owuld not want to trade Freddie.. he is just that much better then Spiller is. Although Spiller could keep improving, there isn't a single thing Freddie does that Spiller does better...

                      trading up is way to expensive a price to pay for a LT.. A stud QB like Luck sure.. but a LT probably not worth the cost


                      How about this fantasy trade, Spencer and/or Edwards, #10 this year our 3rd this year, and our 2nd next year..... We have a plethora of DE and DT's on the roster.

                      Comment

                      • djjimkelly
                        Registered User
                        • Apr 2003
                        • 7045

                        #12
                        Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                        Originally posted by MitchMurrayDowntown
                        Tannehill is more in demand than what has been printed, he's en fuego.

                        i think it explains why they truly werent in the matt flynn race i know they hosted him but they didnt try hard

                        Comment

                        • Mr. Miyagi
                          Lecter's Little Bitch

                          • Sep 2002
                          • 53616

                          #13
                          Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                          Originally posted by clumping platelets
                          If he falls to #5...........#10 and Fred Jackson for Kalil at #5


                          Comment

                          • trapezeus
                            Legendary Zoner
                            • Oct 2004
                            • 19525

                            #14
                            Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                            the best rated LT at the 4th pick????makes me scared. and we'd be trading more to get that.

                            bills are in a crappy situation draft wise. not enough talent to trade down, no one they need at 10. I think they'll stay put and take the BPA. That will be a WR, CB, or LB. We could get better at all those positions.

                            Comment

                            • Extremebillsfan247
                              Registered User
                              • Sep 2008
                              • 3142

                              #15
                              Re: So if Miami trades up to #3

                              If Miami traded up to 3 for Tannehill, they are even more screwed up than I thought. I would also not be in favor of the Bills trading up. They just came off of a barely 6 - 10 season. This team can't afford to give up draft picks, at least not yet. JMO

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X