OJ might be innocent

[Skooby]

Sounds like Jr is a creep:

http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/322688/20120402/oj-simpson-innocent-son-committed-murders-private.htm

[jamze132]

Re: OJ might be innocent

Just another nobody trying to make a buck.

[OpIv37]

Re: OJ might be innocent

yup, and Kurt Cobain was murdered and Tupac is still alive and Richard Gere puts gerbils up his ass.

[DraftBoy]

Re: OJ might be innocent

yup, and Kurt Cobain was murdered and Tupac is still alive and Richard Gere puts gerbils up his ass.

Woah, woah, woah....we don't **** around with Tupac.

[chernobylwraiths]

Re: OJ might be innocent

yup, and Kurt Cobain was murdered and Tupac is still alive and Richard Gere puts gerbils up his ass.

I have no idea why you felt the need to add a third choice. The fact you went THERE with it is interesting from a psychological standpoint.

[DraftBoy]

Re: OJ might be innocent

I have no idea why you felt the need to add a third choice. The fact you went THERE with it is interesting from a psychological standpoint.

You havent heard the Richard Gere Gerbil story?

[Jeff1220]

Re: OJ might be innocent

It's plausible enough though. Imagine if it were true. Wow.

[chernobylwraiths]

Re: OJ might be innocent

You havent heard the Richard Gere Gerbil story?

No, I thought he pulled that one out of his ass.

[Buckets]

Re: OJ might be innocent

If anyone knows who Dr Henry Lee is I attended a seminar put on by him around 2005 - 06. He testified at OJ's trial. I'm a retired crime lab analyst and Lee brought out some things that may lend creedence to this story. Lee claims that there were 2 sets of bloody foot prints at the scene and that it appears that OJ was not the only one at the scene. At the seminar he more or less came to the same conclusion without actually saying it that OJ was covering up for his son. He also said the the blood swabbings taken at the scene that matched OJ contained preservative, meaning that that prticular blood had been in a test tube prior to being swabbed at the scene. Interesting stuff

[TigerJ]

Re: OJ might be innocent

Yeah, it does sound plausible. I did not even know OJ had a son by his first marriage. As far as our Dear private investigator is concerned, he probably is in it for the money and the notoriety he can gain by publishing this book. That does not, however, necessarily have a bearing on whether or not his story is valid. Jose Canseco probably had some very selfish motives when he started flapping his jaws about steroid use in baseball, but it turns out most of what he said was true.

[Mr. Miyagi]

Re: OJ might be innocent

What difference does it make now? OJ was acquitted for the murder, and now in prison for some other douchebag things he did.

[acehole]

Re: OJ might be innocent

yup, and Kurt Cobain was murdered and Tupac is still alive and Richard Gere puts gerbils up his ass.

yea and sabs mom is a nun..

[Mike]

Re: OJ might be innocent

yup, and Kurt Cobain was murdered and Tupac is still alive and Richard Gere puts gerbils up his ass.

You should have watched the trail. There was proof of 'planted evidence' among other incobsistancies. In the, the OJ trail was a perfect example of the media painting a picture of guilt (well before the trail), getting one sided interviews & evidence during the trail (supported their initial premise), blaming the jury, great lawyers, the police once he was acquitted (stuck with original position & blamed others). The OJ coverage was very one sided, it's amazing that he got off.

PS: I thought he was guilty until I really deved into it

[Bill Cody]

Re: OJ might be innocent

yeah sounds reasonable- Jr. did it but OJ had his blood/Nicole's blood all over his Bronco/socks/gloves/fence/sidewalk and OJ drove the Bronco in a trance down the highway for 2 hours because he was innocent and covering for his son. Got it.

If AJ Cowlings decides to write a tell all on how he ditched OJ's clothes/wet suit/knife get back to me, that might be worth a read.

[Bill Cody]

Re: OJ might be innocent

You should have watched the trail. There was proof of 'planted evidence' among other incobsistancies. In the, the OJ trail was a perfect example of the media painting a picture of guilt (well before the trail), getting one sided interviews & evidence during the trail (supported their initial premise), blaming the jury, great lawyers, the police once he was acquitted (stuck with original position & blamed others). The OJ coverage was very one sided, it's amazing that he got off.

PS: I thought he was guilty until I really deved into it

Seriously? You are 1000% wrong. DNA was a new science then and not well understood. if that trial occured today it would take 2 weeks and the jury would convict in an hour. There were literally dozens of blood samples linking OJ to the killings and the odds that he wasn't the killer are larger than earth's population. If you've delved into it it sounds like your sources were the Star, the Enquirer and the Globe. NO.