If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
There is work to be done and things to be learned. We are going to try to get the old look back - or something close to it. We also know there are bugs. A thread will be started to report bugs and then we can pass those onto the host.
Thank you for all the patience and support with this - hopefully this will greatly reduce the crashes and other site issues we have had lately.
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
If Kalil fell to us at #10, we could ask a King's ransom
If Kalil fell to us at #10, we could ask a King's ransom
I think if Kalil fell to us, we could talk someone into a few firsts, a second & a 4th for him. I am not as sold on him as most & think that even though he is the most ready LT in the draft, he's not a sure starter.
Take the 3 early picks over the next few years instead of just one, odds will be better to find us more talent.
Re: If Kalil fell to us at #10, we could ask a King's ransom
Originally posted by MitchMurrayDowntown
I think if Kalil fell to us, we could talk someone into a few firsts, a second & a 4th for him. I am not as sold on him as most & think that even though he is the most ready LT in the draft, he's not a sure starter.
Take the 3 early picks over the next few years instead of just one, odds will be better to find us more talent.
You don't pass on a prospect with that kind of talent at 10 for more draft picks. If Kalil is there, the Bills are taking him. I'd bet the house on it.
Re: If Kalil fell to us at #10, we could ask a King's ransom
Originally posted by Extremebillsfan247
. If Kalil is there, the Bills are taking him. I'd bet the house on it.
Don't take out a mortgage. What if was Indy that wanted Kalil ?? Would you take their next year's first / 2nd & this year's 2nd ?? How would you like a better than average shot at next year's first pick ?? Would that have some value that you couldn't pass on, besides our own ?
Like I said, I'm not sold on Kalil & if he falls there is a reason behind it. Other teams who didn't expect him to fall might of not did all their homework for him & would be willing to reach big time. Think about Buffalo not bringing in Luck because they didn't expect him to be available, it's really the same premise.
Re: If Kalil fell to us at #10, we could ask a King's ransom
If he falls to ten how could we get what the Rams got for the second over all pick? For a non qb? How does that make any sense?
Also, forget all that: We need a tackle. He is the best available. He would also be the BPA at ten. He might be the BPA if he makes it to pick five. Nothing about your "scenario" makes any sense.
Re: If Kalil fell to us at #10, we could ask a King's ransom
Originally posted by MitchMurrayDowntown
Don't take out a mortgage. What if was Indy that wanted Kalil ?? Would you take their next year's first & this year's 1st / 2nd ?? How would you like a better than average shot at next year's first pick ?? Would that have some value that you couldn't pass on, besides our own ?
Like I said, I'm not sold on Kalil & if he falls there is a reason behind it. Other teams who didn't expect him to fall might of not did all their homework for him & would be willing to reach big time. Think about Buffalo not bringing in Luck because they didn't expect him to be available, it's really the same premise.
So...then BUF would have the overall #1 pick this year. Pretty steep price to pay for fan darling Floyd, eh?
Re: If Kalil fell to us at #10, we could ask a King's ransom
Originally posted by THRILLHO
If he falls to ten how could we get what the Rams got for the second over all pick? For a non qb? How does that make any sense?
Also, forget all that: We need a tackle. He is the best available. He would also be the BPA at ten. He might be the BPA if he makes it to pick five. Nothing about your "scenario" makes any sense.
We need NFL starters & the more chances we have at getting starters, the more likely we will get one.
I'll use a buffettism here: If someone really wants to buy something, you sell it to them. If they really want to sell it, you buy it.
Tweet
Comment