The Bills will trade down this year..

[acehole]

Add dallas, NYJ, KC, Cinc to THE list OF TRADE partners.


Add that to the people we invited (lower round prospects)

Not inside info but an observation...

Stay tuned for final tidbit btw.

>>>
Chargers | Have talked about trading up for Mark Barron
Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:54:33 -0700

The San Diego Chargers have strong interest in Alabama SS Mark Barron, and they have discussed potentially trading up for him.



Read more: http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl#ixzz1sxXEDkRi

[Ginger Vitis]

Add dallas, NYJ, KC, Cinc to THE list OF TRADE partners.



So the KC Chiefs are wanting to trade up from #11 to #10?

[jamze132]

Depending on who is available at #10, a trade down is a very real possibility. Hope you don't think you are posting "I told you so" threads.

[psubills62]

I've always thought Dallas was a possible trade partner, depending on who they really want.

[ddaryl]

moving back in this draft could pay some dividends.

The value in the last 2/3's of the 1st rd is relatively equal, which makes you really wonder where all these trade rumors are coming from.

[acehole]

So the KC Chiefs are wanting to trade up from #11 to #10?

KC wants the LB Luke

[acehole]

I've always thought Dallas was a possible trade partner, depending on who they really want.


Castro and Barron High on list.

[acehole]

Depending on who is available at #10, a trade down is a very real possibility. Hope you don't think you are posting "I told you so" threads.

No but I do say things that later on people in the media say.

This is just what I see...with the new roster size bills will have the room to develop some guys in the later rounds....outside of top 6-8 there is not alot of cant miss special players....so the shot gun approach seem best.

Draft a lot of guys...including small school prospects and get guys in place when player you have become FA's...hopfully they can step in..... If you can get 2-3-4 starters for the next year on top of that....

Home run.

[CleveSteve]

Add CLE to the list of possibilities if either Blackmon or Richardson fall to 10 for 22+37.

[JCBills]

I think CLE, CIN, DAL, SD are all possible partners.

[stuckincincy]

Add dallas, NYJ, KC, Cinc to THE list OF TRADE partners.



I'm not getting why folks think that CIN is interested in moving up to #10. I don't see a player they have the hots for there.

AFAIK, owner Brown has traded up once, for Ki-Jana Carter in 1995.

[TheGhostofJimKelly]

With 10 picks in the draft, I think it will be quality over quantity, no trade down.

[CleveSteve]

you don't think Cincy would offer 17 + 53 for Blackmon or Richardson?

[HAMMER]

If Nix's guy is there at 10 there will be no trade down.

[CleveSteve]

With 10 picks in the draft, I think it will be quality over quantity, no trade down.

If there's not a player they really like at 10, I could see them trading down for 2 top-50 picks then just using their Round 5-and-on picks trying to move up from other positions. Depends on who is available.

Call it "quantity of quality."

[psubills62]

With 10 picks in the draft, I think it will be quality over quantity, no trade down.
I've been thinking they might use a couple of the extra picks to move back up into the second round (like when they did with Levitre).

I wouldn't mind if they traded down, picked up an extra second rounder, then moved around so that they ended up with four first and second round picks.

Or even trade back for a future 1st rounder, then still move back up into the 2nd round.

However, I don't know that I see Nix wheeling and dealing...JMO.

[stuckincincy]

you don't think Cincy would offer 17 + 53 for Blackmon or Richardson?

I'd be quite surprised if either were there at #10.

Hard to see Blackmon sharing center stage with AJ Green. And CIN's been shouting from the rooftops about "running back by committee."

If Richardson fell to #10, I'd advise BUF to grab him and peddle Spiller off to the highest bidder.

[justasportsfan]

The San Diego Chargers have strong interest in Alabama SS Mark Barron, and they have discussed potentially trading up for him.


"Hey Buddy , Aj Smith is on the phone"

:tap: <- buddy

[don137]

If Nix and company covet one guy they will not trade down. If they have a few guys in mind and he is assured to get one of them based on who is their trading partner then they may do it. I really do not see them trading with the Jets or Bengals. That may be too far. I think it would be someone like Dallas where they would only trade down 4 spots.

[Ed]

I hope we end up trading down. I would love an extra 2nd round pick or more. If multiple teams are interested then we should be able to get a better deal too.

[Mahdi]

I can see the Chargers trading up for DeCastro with all the problems they have in their interior OL.

They want to get Mathews going and get their dominant run game back. Kris Dielman their ALL-Pro G retired and they will probably be desperate to fill the spot with a guy like DeCastro.

DeCastro playing in California is probably a bonus too.

[Bill Cody]

If Richardson fell to #10, I'd advise BUF to grab him and peddle Spiller off to the highest bidder.

Lather, rinse, repeat

[Bill Cody]

If Nix's guy is there at 10 there will be no trade down.


Luck?

[Mski]

Add CLE to the list of possibilities if either Blackmon or Richardson fall to 10 for 22+37.If Blackmon is there, we're taking him, not trading down... hate to say it, but same hold true for Richardson

[ThunderGun]

If Richardson fell to #10, I'd advise BUF to grab him and peddle Spiller off to the highest bidder.

Brilliant!

We drafted Lynch in the 1st round, then replaced him with Spiller and took a 4th for Lynch. Talk about return-on-investment!!!

Now we can draft Richardson, and take an awesome, 4th round pick for Spiller.

And then in 3 years, we can draft another RB in the 1st round and dump Richardson.

And then in another 3 years, we can draft another RB in the 1st round to replace that guy.

And then in another 3 years.....

[stuckincincy]

Brilliant!

We drafted Lynch in the 1st round, then replaced him with Spiller and took a 4th for Lynch. Talk about return-on-investment!!!

Now we can draft Richardson, and take an awesome, 4th round pick for Spiller.

And then in 3 years, we can draft another RB in the 1st round and dump Richardson.

And then in another 3 years, we can draft another RB in the 1st round to replace that guy.

And then in another 3 years.....

Why break with tradition? :bandwagon

[Skooby]

Why break with tradition? :bandwagon

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRdfX7ut8gw&feature=youtube_gdata_player