Jets trade up to #3?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mjt328
    Registered User
    • May 2011
    • 636

    Jets trade up to #3?

    I just heard on ESPN that the Jets are considering a trade up to get Trent Richardson. Obviously, to do that would probably require a move to #3 with the Vikings.

    This would have a major impact on Buffalo's draft. First of all, it would add a potientally elite running back to the division. Second, it could force a player to fall like Kalil or Blackmon.

    In this scenario, we would likely be looking at:

    3 - NY Jets - Richardson
    4 - Cleveland - Blackmon or Tannehill
    5 - St. Louis - Kalil, Blackmon or Cox
    6 - Tampa - Claiborne
    2013 "My Should Have" Draft
    Posted During the 2013 Draft
    1 - (16): Geno Smith, QB, West Virginia
    2 - (41): Robert Woods, WR, USC
    2 - (46): Arthur Brown, LB, Kansas State
    3 - (78): Quinton Patton, WR, Louisiana Tech
    4 - (105): Barrett Jones, OG, Alabama
    5 - (143): Brandon Jenkins, LB, Florida State
    6 - (177): Da'Rick Rogers, WR, Tennessee Tech
    7 - (222): Tyler Bray, QB, Tennessee

    2013 Buddy Nix Draft
    1 - (16): E.J. Manuel, QB, Florida State
    2 - (41): Robert Woods, WR, USC
    2 - (46): Kiko Alonso, LB, Oregon
    3 - (78): Marquise Goodwin, WR, Texas
    4 - (105): Duke Williams, FS, Nevada
    5 - (143): Jonathan Meeks, SS, Clemson
    6 - (177): Dustin Hopkins, K, Florida State
    7 - (222): Chris Gragg, TE, Arkansas
  • ThunderGun
    Registered User
    • Dec 2011
    • 625

    #2
    Re: Jets trade up to #3?

    I doubt they move up that high, but if they did, this is how I it going down:

    3 - NYJ - Richardson
    4 - CLE - Claiborne
    5 - STL - Blackmon
    6 - Tampa - Kalil

    So I don't think Blackmon or Kalil will fall very far.

    Comment

    • CleveSteve
      Registered User
      • Apr 2011
      • 999

      #3
      Re: Jets trade up to #3?

      I think it would be pretty clear...

      3 NYJ Richardson
      4 CLE Blackmon
      5 TB Claiborne
      6 STL Kalil

      Comment

      • Bangarang
        Registered User
        • Sep 2010
        • 1686

        #4
        Re: Jets trade up to #3?

        I don't think it would alter the way Nix approaches our 1st pick at all.

        Comment

        • Extremebillsfan247
          Registered User
          • Sep 2008
          • 3142

          #5
          Re: Jets trade up to #3?

          I'm hearing that it's very unlikely unless Richardson slips out of the top 5. The Jets would have to give up too much to get him otherwise and have a bunch of needs they intend to address in this draft if possible.

          Comment

          • stuckincincy
            Buffalo Bills Fan
            • Sep 2003
            • 15084

            #6
            Re: Jets trade up to #3?

            Originally posted by mjt328
            I just heard on ESPN that the Jets are considering a trade up to get Trent Richardson. Obviously, to do that would probably require a move to #3 with the Vikings.

            This would have a major impact on Buffalo's draft. First of all, it would add a potientally elite running back to the division. Second, it could force a player to fall like Kalil or Blackmon.

            In this scenario, we would likely be looking at:

            3 - NY Jets - Richardson
            4 - Cleveland - Blackmon or Tannehill
            5 - St. Louis - Kalil, Blackmon or Cox
            6 - Tampa - Claiborne
            It's not obvious...why deal with MIN? They for sure aren't in the rb market (unless their senseless act of putting Peterson back on the field - and him agreeing to it - has backfired big time and nobody's talking.), whereas CLE has a better likelihood of having an eye on Richardson.

            Copping a term from young folks.., "I call BS!!!"
            Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Noli timere. Laus Deo.

            Comment

            • Cali512
              Registered User
              • Jan 2012
              • 6393

              #7
              Re: Jets trade up to #3?

              The Jets would be stupid to do this. Revis and Cromartie cant cover forever, and the Jets have no passrush. They also have no WR, and if i remember correctly, isnt there RB supposed to be really good? Greene? I hope this happens, it would be hilarious
              Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions

              Comment

              • Bert102176
                Registered User
                • Aug 2002
                • 3742

                #8
                Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                Originally posted by ThunderGun
                I doubt they move up that high, but if they did, this is how I it going down:

                3 - NYJ - Richardson
                4 - CLE - Claiborne
                5 - STL - Blackmon
                6 - Tampa - Kalil

                So I don't think Blackmon or Kalil will fall very far.




                Tampa has a young LT they won't take Kalil
                lets go BUFFALO lets go BUFFALO

                Comment

                • FlyingDutchman
                  Registered User
                  • Apr 2005
                  • 5074

                  #9
                  Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                  This would be stupid IMO...Shonn Greene wasn't that bad, they just had no clue how to use him and got away from smash mouth football which was supposed to be the Jets way

                  Comment

                  • MitchMurrayDowntown
                    Skoobasaurus-Rex
                    • Oct 2011
                    • 22284

                    #10
                    Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                    Isn't Tebow a good enough RB?

                    Comment

                    • CleveSteve
                      Registered User
                      • Apr 2011
                      • 999

                      #11
                      Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                      you guys know tampa (and not STL) is picking 5, right? And that if Richardson is gone, they're a lock to take Claiborne?

                      Comment

                      • Cali512
                        Registered User
                        • Jan 2012
                        • 6393

                        #12
                        Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                        Originally posted by CleveSteve
                        you guys know tampa (and not STL) is picking 5, right? And that if Richardson is gone, they're a lock to take Claiborne?


                        And if both are gone, there getting Blackmon. So no matter what i dont see any of them getting Kalil
                        Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions

                        Comment

                        • better days
                          Registered User
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 22028

                          #13
                          Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                          Originally posted by stuckincincy
                          It's not obvious...why deal with MIN? They for sure aren't in the rb market (unless their senseless act of putting Peterson back on the field - and him agreeing to it - has backfired big time and nobody's talking.), whereas CLE has a better likelihood of having an eye on Richardson.

                          Copping a term from young folks.., "I call BS!!!"
                          That is the reason to move to 3, AHEAD of Cleveland.

                          Comment

                          • more cowbell
                            Registered User
                            • Apr 2006
                            • 1489

                            #14
                            Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                            Anything to grab the headlines for these idiots...this was reported on ESPN too? Shocker.
                            The last time the Bills made the playoffs was 1999.

                            Comment

                            • better days
                              Registered User
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 22028

                              #15
                              Re: Jets trade up to #3?

                              Originally posted by Bert102176
                              Tampa has a young LT they won't take Kalil
                              If Clayborne is off the board & Kalil falls to the Bucs, I think they would be more than happy to trade down.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X