There's no need for McKelvin with Gilmore drafted #1. It's time to just cut our losses on a guy who never quite understood the NFL game. It was our fault for drafting a Troy guy that high and expecting him to easily adjust to the big jump up. Buddy knows better than using that high a pick on a small college player.
Can we cut McKelvin NOW
Collapse
X
-
Re: Can we cut McKelvin NOW
I dont know what people are saying bout McKelvins returns. Rogers took over half the season and did amaziing. I think its a for gone conclusion hell be doing the returnsNot here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Can we cut McKelvin NOW
Originally posted by Albany,n.y.There's no need for McKelvin with Gilmore drafted #1. It's time to just cut our losses on a guy who never quite understood the NFL game. It was our fault for drafting a Troy guy that high and expecting him to easily adjust to the big jump up. Buddy knows better than using that high a pick on a small college player.
You guys are always so quick to cut everyone.
Yeah cut him and leave an open roster spot.......Real Smart!!!
Comment
-
-
Re: Can we cut McKelvin NOW
Originally posted by THATHURMANATORWill we???.... So lame
You are pouting because the Bills didn't pick the guy that you watched 2 times this year and wanted.... OHHHH POOOR BABY...
I watch Floyd a bunch this year. I also watched how ****ty and predictable our offense became last year--and at no point did we have a big target to stretch the field.
You're content with 2003. Good for you. I'll take 2002 over 2003 10 times outta 10, thoughLast edited by BillsOverDolphins; 04-26-2012, 10:57 PM.Oh no!...We suck again!
-
👍 1
Comment
-
-
Re: Can we cut McKelvin NOW
Why in gods name woukd we cut McFumblin. He is great on kick returns and kick coverage, and half of out cbs are injured every year. And he has never once complained about getting benched, like most guys would.
He obviously didn't work out, but I don't get the McKelvin hate.
Comment
-
-
Re: Can we cut McKelvin NOW
Originally posted by THATHURMANATORRodgers was returning kickoffs not punts.
Lol well everyone was saying "kickoff" returns, so i thought thats what we were still talking aboutNot here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions
Comment
-
Comment