Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • ublinkwescore
    Sab and TD are insignificant
    • Sep 2002
    • 24178
    #1

    Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

    How? He was having an MVP type season before being IR'd. To me, that should have made him crack the top 25.
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire
    Tags: None
  • ublinkwescore
    Sab and TD are insignificant
    • Sep 2002
    • 24178
    #2
    Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

    This was NFL network's top 100 players of 2011.
    www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

    Comment

    • Meathead
      Insufferable ***** and perpetual crybaby
      • Jul 2002
      • 21349
      #3
      Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

      oh well at first i thought you meant 83rd best chicken wing eater and i was like meh but now that its nfl network im outraged
      One set of rules for all in the beloved community

      Comment

      • Oaf
        Do you read what you write?
        • Jun 2007
        • 6151
        #4
        Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

        He definitely performed better than some of the other players above him.

        • 👍 1

        Comment

        • Raptor
          Registered User
          • Jan 2009
          • 1303
          #5
          Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

          He was ranked right where he should be. Got to stay healthy

          Comment

          • MitchMurrayDowntown
            Skoobasaurus-Rex
            • Oct 2011
            • 22284
            #6
            Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

            If he'd of stay healthy, he'd be top 10.

            Comment

            • ServoBillieves
              The Voice of Reason
              • Jul 2007
              • 6106
              #7
              Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

              London Fletcher, Jason Peters, Willis McGahee...
              Bye Bye Brady...
              • 👍 1

              Comment

              • ublinkwescore
                Sab and TD are insignificant
                • Sep 2002
                • 24178
                #8
                Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

                MVP type season by itself should have placed him significantly higher regardless of if it was only half of a season. end of subject.
                www.gamersconspiracy.com - where gamers conspire

                Comment

                • Raptor
                  Registered User
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 1303
                  #9
                  Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

                  Originally posted by ublinkwescore
                  MVP type season by itself should have placed him significantly higher regardless of if it was only half of a season. end of subject.

                  Why? You have to be able to go out there week after week? He should be ranked ahead of players that played more...no


                  I mean by you standards a player that just had 2 great weeks and 14 ****ty ones should be ranked on the merit of just the two weeks

                  Comment

                  • bosshogg21
                    Registered User
                    • Aug 2007
                    • 230
                    #10
                    Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

                    Originally posted by Raptor
                    Why? You have to be able to go out there week after week? He should be ranked ahead of players that played more...no


                    I mean by you standards a player that just had 2 great weeks and 14 ****ty ones should be ranked on the merit of just the two weeks

                    Peyton manning 0 downs = ranked 50? Yea whatever. You should have to play to be ranked and I love Peyton.
                    • 👍 2

                    Comment

                    • Beebe
                      Registered User
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 532
                      #11
                      Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

                      Why is PAYTON MANNING on there? It's about what you did last year right?
                      • 👍 2

                      Comment

                      • bosshogg21
                        Registered User
                        • Aug 2007
                        • 230
                        #12
                        Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

                        It's an extremely stupid ranking system and basically a popularity contest.
                        • 👍 2

                        Comment

                        • Raptor
                          Registered User
                          • Jan 2009
                          • 1303
                          #13
                          Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

                          Originally posted by bosshogg21
                          Peyton manning 0 downs = ranked 50? Yea whatever. You should have to play to be ranked and I love Peyton.

                          Because players are ****ing stupid and it a perfect example of why they should never be allowed to vote for the HOF

                          I don't give a **** about the list but the notion that a player shouldn't be penalized for missing games is stupid at best and thats what Im saying.

                          Comment

                          • gr8slayer
                            Registered User
                            • Feb 2005
                            • 20796
                            #14
                            Re: Fred Jackson was only rated #83?

                            I don't know why people get worked up over these stupid lists, who cares?

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...
                            X