PDA

View Full Version : What is the 2012 Buffalo Bills weakest individual position



Skooby
06-24-2012, 06:21 PM
What is the weakest individual position for the 2012 Buffalo Bills ??

Jeff1220
06-24-2012, 06:34 PM
This one is a little more difficult. :(

Cali512
06-24-2012, 07:07 PM
Breaking it down 1-10

QB- 7
RB- 9
FB- 10
WR- 6
TE- 7
OT- 7
G/C- 9
DE- 10
DT- 10
LB- 8
CB- 9
DB- 9

WR is probably the worst, but we have so many WRs that that could easily change

BillsOverDolphins
06-24-2012, 07:09 PM
WR, and it's not even close.

- - - Updated - - -

I take that back, TE is somewhat close

jamze132
06-24-2012, 08:18 PM
Both T positions

TigerJ
06-24-2012, 10:31 PM
Honestly, I don't know, and I'm not sure anyone does at this point. There is too much that is unknown at WR and offensive tackle. Either of them might be at this point. As Cali said, Buffalo has a lot of WR, but more than that they have a lot of receivers with significant upside. They only need a couple of those guys to manifest some of that upside to take the position out of contention for "worst consideration." With offensive tackle, the Bills only need one guy between Cordy Glenn and Chris Hairston to be solid, and that position gets removed from weakest consideration. If both of those positions turn out to be decent, then maybe it's between tight end and quarterback. Even linebacker might deserve a little consideration if it becomes clear Morrison no longer has much in the tank and none of his potential replacements is really capable. That seems a bit unllikely though.

Skooby
06-24-2012, 10:37 PM
I think it's QB then LB myself. Fitz has had many years in the league & I just don't see a major upside. We've been violated so many times on 8-14 yard passes, I can't count. I'm also used to our weekly multi-yard runs for first downs, we've been pretty porous for a while.

Fitz is currently our best option but it's almost like having that 200 Lbs fat chick that left at the bar during closing time. She's ready to go but you're going nowhere past the last time you played her.

Ed
06-25-2012, 12:15 PM
I'd probably say SLB right now, but it's not really a critical position. Maybe TE. I like what I'm hearing about Scott Chandler, but that doesn't mean much right now.

YardRat
06-25-2012, 01:52 PM
Center. An injury waiting to happen and, well, nobody else.

BertSquirtgum
06-25-2012, 01:56 PM
Wide receiver

justasportsfan
06-25-2012, 01:57 PM
refs.



NE has them all

DraftBoy
06-25-2012, 02:01 PM
Its a toss up between OT, OC, and WR for the most part.

psubills62
06-25-2012, 02:49 PM
Yeah I'd say TE, OC, or WR.

stuckincincy
06-25-2012, 03:51 PM
LB. The plan seems to be rush the passer, so then the opposition will roll out and sting the middle with passes, pop one to the ignored fellow outside, or sucker the rush with draws.

Whoever is coaching the DL better lay off time to time. Just hold the LOS. Play basic defense. Don't get cute play after play.

Extremebillsfan247
06-27-2012, 06:30 AM
Besides Stevie Johnson what receiver on this team would even start on another? there's your answer. There isn't a receiver on this team that's good enough to push Stevie Johnson to get better, and that worries me. I don't know why. JMO

Jan Reimers
06-27-2012, 09:20 AM
No proven LT, no depth at C, and a receiving corps with Johnson, Nelson and Jones at the top, which doesn't really strike fear into the hearts of opposing secondaries.

Skooby
06-27-2012, 11:44 AM
I actually see our offense getting better this season, someone is going to rise to the top with Stevie because we have so many bodies there.

ServoBillieves
06-27-2012, 11:53 AM
It's really sad that I have to say Center when we have a perennial all-star at the position. We have great swing players and Urbik can switch while Rinehart takes over and it doesn't feel much like a downgrade.

That being said, I believe it's LB. I like Sheppard, Barnett is a tank, and Morrison (aside from last year) has always proven to be a solid player. The depth is so haywire that it's tough to pinpoint who is going to come in if one of them goes down. With this being a passing league, I see a lot of Sheppard with Scott and the dime... but on running downs/teams, it worries me if one of them goes down.

2nd would be TE unless Dorin is part of a catch package and Scott can learn how to block and use his size.

I don't see WR as a bad position. A lot of bodies, good depth and good experience. Nelson and Stevie are a great tandem in a 3 spread but most people are always wondering about the #2. Jones was the guy, Jones is back. Easley looked good, Easley's back. They have a lot of faith in Hagan, here he is. Injuries make most of these positions hard to judge, but it's no excuse. We don't know until the season... which needs to ****ing get here.

Mr. Pink
06-27-2012, 11:55 PM
OT it's not even close.

Johnny Bugmenot
06-28-2012, 05:55 AM
Owner.

don137
06-28-2012, 07:01 AM
Depends on if your talking about starters or depth.

Starters: WR, OT and QB
Depth: C

PTI
06-28-2012, 04:53 PM
QB and TE

Skooby
06-28-2012, 05:12 PM
QB and TE

Not a huge suprise here.