Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • YardRat
    Well, lookie here...
    • Dec 2004
    • 86151
    #1

    Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

    Catches = 76
    Yards = 1004
    Avg = 13.2
    TDs = 7
    Longest = 55
    Benchings = 1
    YardRat Wall of Fame
    #56 DARRYL TALLEY     #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS
    Tags: None
    • 👍 1
  • dog14787
    Registered User
    • Oct 2010
    • 1701
    #2
    Re: Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

    I'll say about the same.



    Note: Haven't been here to post for awhile and I really like the improvements.
    Last edited by Figster; 07-04-2012, 08:27 AM.

    Comment

    • MitchMurrayDowntown
      Skoobasaurus-Rex
      • Oct 2011
      • 22284
      #3
      Re: Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

      Better.

      Comment

      • tatersalad
        Registered User
        • Apr 2008
        • 498
        #4
        Re: Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

        worse, I think the bills run the ball more than 55 percent of the time

        Comment

        • Night Train
          Retired - On Several Levels
          • Jul 2005
          • 33117
          #5
          Re: Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

          Originally posted by tatersalad View Post
          worse, I think the bills run the ball more than 55 percent of the time
          The Bills pass first to set up the run.

          I bet the RB's catch a boatload of swing passes this year, in place of many running plays.
          Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit

          Comment

          • X-Era
            What this generation tolerates, the next generation will embrace
            • Feb 2005
            • 27670
            #6
            Re: Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

            I really think better. Graham and a healthy Easley and Jones may take some heat off of him. But in our spread the ball goes all over so he'll likely usually face only double coverage anyway.

            I think a better reason may be David Lee... If Fitz can improve his accuracy due to better footwork and mechanics, we should see more completions.

            Really the only thing working against him is his big contract... Teams clearly know who's the #1 WR and he will have more attention.

            Comment

            • BidsJr
              Registered User
              • Sep 2002
              • 2858
              #7
              Re: Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

              Originally posted by X-Era View Post
              Really the only thing working against him is his big contract... Teams clearly know who's the #1 WR and he will have more attention.

              LOL at this. Saying how much a player makes factors into how he is game-planned is pure comedy.
              "Well I drink too much and get punched in the head by fighters for fun, so my memory isn't so great." -OpIv37

              Comment

              • ServoBillieves
                The Voice of Reason
                • Jul 2007
                • 6106
                #8
                Re: Stats and SJ13-Better, Worse, or Close to the Same?

                I don't like to use the term "Worse" when it isn't necessarily a bad thing. If he has less targets and less yards that means that the other WR's are picking up the slack. He had NO help other than Chandler and Nelson last year, so if we have other productive receivers, I think he sees less of the double team and flourishes, but the numbers won't be so blatant.
                Bye Bye Brady...

                Comment

                Previous template Next
                Working...
                X