START BRADHAM

[Cali512]

He made some mistakes but cmon, he just fn broke someones arm. I really like him, he hits really hard and covers decent. Hell have some mistakes but hell be ok.

[kingJofNYC]

Re: START BRADHAM

he's had two good series all night. looks lost at times, lucky he has the athleticism because he doesn't have it upstairs, not yet anyway.

[Mr. Pink]

Re: START BRADHAM

So because he hurt someone you want him to play? Interesting.

[Cali512]

Re: START BRADHAM

So because he hurt someone you want him to play? Interesting.

No its just how hard he hits. I was refering more to how painfull it looked

[BertSquirtgum]

Re: START BRADHAM

No.

[ublinkwescore]

Re: START BRADHAM

Only if he can hurt a certain ******* in our division who wears the number 12.

[YardRat]

Re: START BRADHAM

Too early.

[bills4ver]

Re: START BRADHAM

He looked like a lost puppy out there on most plays lol

[Joe Fo Sho]

Re: START BRADHAM

I don't know guys, I think the Bills should listen to him. I mean, this is the guy who said David Nelson would be our best undrafted free agent in 2010.

[Night Train]

Re: START BRADHAM

Too early.

Talented but raw as any rookie. Like everyone stated, he needs to learn in spot duty.

[k-oneputt]

Re: START BRADHAM

Is he any worse then Moats ?

I say start him.

[Cali512]

Re: START BRADHAM

Sorry everyone didnt know i made this, read my sig

[kingJofNYC]

Re: START BRADHAM

Is he any worse then Moats ?

I say start him.

yeah, he kind is worse than moats right now, last night showed it. while moats ****ed up on the long leshoure run, Bradham ****ed up repeatedly. obviously Bradham had more opportunity to **** up, but i think it says something about when he can't leapfrog Moats on the depth. Morrison didn't look either last night.

said it in another thread, but i watched the jets/panthers last week, and Luke Kuechly looked incredible. i know it's not always great value to take a LB early, but if we have a shot at a good one this year we have to pull the trigger, can't try to fill the holes with 4th and 5th rounders.

[ghz in pittsburgh]

Re: START BRADHAM

said it in another thread, but i watched the jets/panthers last week, and Luke Kuechly looked incredible. i know it's not always great value to take a LB early, but if we have a shot at a good one this year we have to pull the trigger, can't try to fill the holes with 4th and 5th rounders.

Unfortunately every team only gets 1st round pick and Kuechly was drafted ahead of the Bills, like we really had a choice. Looking back last year, we got Dareus, but I watched Pathers all season last year and I wished we had drafted Newton.

If Nix wants to win big, he needs to put effort into finding a QB to groom. In other words, he needs to take some risks, instead of taking the safe approach in draft that he's done so far.

[kingJofNYC]

Re: START BRADHAM

Unfortunately every team only gets 1st round pick and Kuechly was drafted ahead of the Bills, like we really had a choice. Looking back last year, we got Dareus, but I watched Pathers all season last year and I wished we had drafted Newton.

If Nix wants to win big, he needs to put effort into finding a QB to groom. In other words, he needs to take some risks, instead of taking the safe approach in draft that he's done so far.

i know that kuechly was taken ahead, i'm just pointing out that the earlier we go LB next year the better. i felt like the lb position was pretty deep last year, but we waited until the middle of the draft to take one.

nix was given a pretty barren roster, it's hard to move up and be aggressive when you have a bunch of holes to fill. this year they have more freedom to make a move up, i think so anyway. dalton in the second would've been perfect, or a dalton/green combo, but then our DL would have a hole in the middle. i think most of the fanbase would've been pissed off if they took green at the time, but if you pose that question now....