My Bills/Browns "Hot Reads"

[Coach Sal]

Lots of reaction from everywhere. I try to give some perspective and thoughts on some of the less talked-about stuff that mattered Sunday

http://wgr550.com/CAPACCIO--Hot-Reads--Bills-Browns/14313488

[Forward_Lateral]

Re: My Bills/Browns "Hot Reads"

Great comments, as usual.

I still have questions about the fumble call. It sure looked like an attempted pass.

[ParanoidAndroid]

Re: My Bills/Browns "Hot Reads"

When I see the ball go forward, I wonder how that happens if he loses posession during his backward motion. The laws of physics don't allow that. He was not hit on the arm; there was no contact whatsoever. It was just him and the ball. So, how does the ball travel forward unless there is forward force, otherwise known as a forward pass?

[gebobs]

Re: My Bills/Browns "Hot Reads"

When I see the ball go forward, I wonder how that happens if he loses posession during his backward motion. The laws of physics don't allow that. He was not hit on the arm; there was no contact whatsoever. It was just him and the ball. So, how does the ball travel forward unless there is forward force, otherwise known as a forward pass?

The way I interpret the call was that, even though the ball was being propelled forward by his fingers, it was our of his hand/possession.

[MTBillsFan]

Re: My Bills/Browns "Hot Reads"

When I see the ball go forward, I wonder how that happens if he loses posession during his backward motion. The laws of physics don't allow that. He was not hit on the arm; there was no contact whatsoever. It was just him and the ball. So, how does the ball travel forward unless there is forward force, otherwise known as a forward pass?

My thoughts exactly! Then again, the laws of physics don't apply to the Bills. "Home-run throwback" comes to mind. Refs blew it then and yesterday. At least this time it didn't hurt the Bills.