If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
"Probable" - Definitely playing
"Questionable" - Playing until he further injures himself
"Doubtful" - Might play. Going to pump him full of drugs in the morning and see if he can stand up.
"Out" - Out. Probably.
We need at least one of these guys to have any shot at all at this game.
I'm hoping it's Spiller since a) he seems to be better than Jackson at this point and b) his injury is upper-body so it's less likely to affect his speed, whereas Jackson has a knee injury that may slow him down even if he is ready to go. But, I'll be happy to get Jackson back for this game as well. He picks his holes better and is a better blocker.
I had a feeling that this is how it would be, on Thursday Jackson said he was 70%, usually when a athlete is at 70%, they'll say they're at 90%. You'll rarely hear a player say that he thinks he'll play, that he's at 70%. I wouldn't want Jackson to rush back too early and then end up losing him for another 2-4 weeks. As far as Spiller goes, it's just too early. I don't know if he could risk further damage (I would imagine so), but with him, I certainly would not want to risk it. I'm sure it will impact the game and even though I'm not the biggest Choice fan, he did a good job last week. Also I believe that this game is going to depend a lot more on the arm of Fitz, I'm just hoping that he's up to it.
I had a feeling that this is how it would be, on Thursday Jackson said he was 70%, usually when a athlete is at 70%, they'll say they're at 90%. You'll rarely hear a player say that he thinks he'll play, that he's at 70%. I wouldn't want Jackson to rush back too early and then end up losing him for another 2-4 weeks. As far as Spiller goes, it's just too early. I don't know if he could risk further damage (I would imagine so), but with him, I certainly would not want to risk it. I'm sure it will impact the game and even though I'm not the biggest Choice fan, he did a good job last week. Also I believe that this game is going to depend a lot more on the arm of Fitz, I'm just hoping that he's up to it.
I don't think Jackson said he was 70% healthy. I think he said there was a 70% chance that he would paly.
what if gailey told spiller to fake an injury to play head games with Belicheat - that would be awesome if it works, but if it doesn't, chan looks like Gene Hackman taking a role as an *******.
Comment