His offense is based on what the D gives him rather than being able to impose his will on defenses. He doesn't run an offense that can run even when teams try to stop the run. He doesn't have a system that can throw at will when teams try to stop them.
The gameplan against Fitz is very simple, stop the run and dare Fitz to throw deep.Put the game on his shoulders. He'll occasionally get his throws in but eventually he'll make his mistakes.
Tavaris JAckson is not ready according to Chan. Are you kidding me? He's a vet . Tannehill threw for 421 yards against a good D. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE OTHER ROOKIES WHO ARE PLAYING BETTER THAN FITZ? Even if Jackson is not ready I'm almost sure he could have made those underthrown passes Fitz threw. Stop overthinking things.
Chan is becoming arrogant when he says his players are better than most people give them credit for.
The Pats have learned from the last few years that even if they can throw at will if they have to, they can be beat without a running game. Now that they got McDaniels back, they are learning to run the ball and it's going to make them even more dangerous once they get better at it.
The gameplan against Fitz is very simple, stop the run and dare Fitz to throw deep.Put the game on his shoulders. He'll occasionally get his throws in but eventually he'll make his mistakes.
Tavaris JAckson is not ready according to Chan. Are you kidding me? He's a vet . Tannehill threw for 421 yards against a good D. HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN THE OTHER ROOKIES WHO ARE PLAYING BETTER THAN FITZ? Even if Jackson is not ready I'm almost sure he could have made those underthrown passes Fitz threw. Stop overthinking things.
Chan is becoming arrogant when he says his players are better than most people give them credit for.
The Pats have learned from the last few years that even if they can throw at will if they have to, they can be beat without a running game. Now that they got McDaniels back, they are learning to run the ball and it's going to make them even more dangerous once they get better at it.
Comment