Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

[blackonyx89]

My brother and I were talking about Fred possibly not being thrilled about his workload being cut now and here's a nightmare scenario. Let's say he gets traded at the end of the season and he winds up as a New York Jet? It's possible this can happen because the Jets don't have a solid RB. He's one of my favorite new school Bills players and it would be cold blooded if they let him go.

[Don't Panic]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

I think Freddie will be just fine with a diminished role so long as he's still in the plans. More than anyone on the team I think he justs wants to see us win... and I don't see him going anywhere after the season ends.

[Mahdi]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

Don't ever see Fred being traded. He is worth more to us as a #2 RB than to any other team in the league as a starter.

[HAMMER]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

I think Fred is smart enough to see the writing on the wall. He got the contract bump he wanted, he will be just fine.

[trapezeus]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

if fred jackson can survive as the red zone specialist and get the td's and see the turnaround with the team with his current contract, he'll be happy.

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

My brother and I were talking about Fred possibly not being thrilled about his workload being cut now and here's a nightmare scenario. Let's say he gets traded at the end of the season and he winds up as a New York Jet? It's possible this can happen because the Jets don't have a solid RB. He's one of my favorite new school Bills players and it would be cold blooded if they let him go.

Too bad for Fred if he is. Spiller is better, and plus I guarantee Fred will get touches. If anything it will prolong his career as he is on the wrong side of 30.

[Raptor]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

If it leads to more wins I dont think he'll care

He got his new deal, he's a team guy, and he might have realized at his age a lighter workload will help him stay healthy and extend his career

[streetkings01]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

Why would we trade a player to a rival? Who does that in the NFL? The only time it happens is when the player is on a sharp decline e.g: Bledsoe, McNabb

[YardRat]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

If it leads to more wins I dont think he'll care

He got his new deal, he's a team guy, and he might have realized at his age a lighter workload will help him stay healthy and extend his career

This ^...

Why would we trade a player to a rival? Who does that in the NFL? The only time it happens is when the player is on a sharp decline e.g: Bledsoe, McNabb

...and this ^.

Above all else, FJ is a team guy, and if the team is winning and he is contributing I can't see him being upset about much.

[OpIv37]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

The guy is a 32 year old undrafted FA running back who was bouncing around bush league football teams a couple of years ago.

I think he's happy he has a contract and a job. And he knew what the deal was with CJ when he signed the contract.

I can't imagine he's disgruntled, especially when he's still getting plenty of carries.

And as incompetent as this FO is, I can't see them doing something as ****ing stupid as trading a starting-caliber RB to a division opponent when we have the worst run D in the league.

[Jaybird]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

not getting traded unless he asks.. and he aint worth much more then a late pick

[IlluminatusUIUC]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

The guy is a 32 year old undrafted FA running back who was bouncing around bush league football teams a couple of years ago.

I think he's happy he has a contract and a job. And he knew what the deal was with CJ when he signed the contract.

I can't imagine he's disgruntled, especially when he's still getting plenty of carries.

And as incompetent as this FO is, I can't see them doing something as ****ing stupid as trading a starting-caliber RB to a division opponent when we have the worst run D in the league.

He's known the score ever since we signed him to back up a Top 15 pick halfback and then drafted a Top 10 halfback to replace him.

And he's not being traded. His contract is untradeable.

[THRILLHO]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

I personally don't care if he's happy. As long as he does his job. He got his contract.

[kishoph]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

I think Fred is smart enough to see the writing on the wall. He got the contract bump he wanted, he will be just fine.

Good post.
If anything, this could prolong Jackson's career, he will be 32 soon and RB's decline fast at this age, at times this season Jackson has shown signs of slowing down, if he hadn't been injured and had time off, the toll of 10 games might have caught up to him by now, there's no telling that for sure, but very few backs have been productive at his age. It also seems that he and Spiller have a good relationship and there's no animosity between them, so Spiller getting the nod, shouldn't be a problem. I also believe that there will not be that big of a difference in the amount of touches gets, Jackson's averaging around 10 carries a game, I don't think it will be much less. We may just see Spiller getting the ball more than he has, hopefully meaning that they'll use the two RB's more.

[Extremebillsfan247]

Re: Fred Jackson-Do you think he's happy being technically a #2 RB?

My brother and I were talking about Fred possibly not being thrilled about his workload being cut now and here's a nightmare scenario. Let's say he gets traded at the end of the season and he winds up as a New York Jet? It's possible this can happen because the Jets don't have a solid RB. He's one of my favorite new school Bills players and it would be cold blooded if they let him go.

Even if the Bills did decide to trade Jackson which they wont, it definitely wont be to a team in our own division. The only way Jackson would end up with the Jets is if the Bills cut him. That has no realistic shot of happening any time soon unless he blows a knee out, or something, in which case the Bills would be better off without him anyway. Then you could bet the house that the Bills spend a draft pick on another RB to replace him. Nix and Gailey favor the 2 back system.