Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

[jamze132]

Lets play not to lose instead of playing to win. Yeah, that worked out. Again.

So sick and damn tired of this bullshizer. Gailey either has no damn balls or no confidence in Fitz (which is totally understandable) which is absolutely holding this team back.

[BertSquirtgum]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

This ****** hitched his wagon to Putzputrid and should be fired just for that reason alone. Completely inept.

[Beebe]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

How big was it for Chan not to go for the field goal earlier.

[Historian]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

Lindell was pissed.

[BertSquirtgum]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

Lindell was pissed.

I saw that too.

[Novacane]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

Wonder what loser Ralph will bring in next

[jamze132]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

Can't believe he pulled Lindell in that spot. Total pussy.

[Beebe]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

Fitz is just like a hooker she gets her money then sucks and swallows.

[billsburgh]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

during his press conference, Gaiey said he changed his mind becuase at first he was told that it was 50 yards, but then he saw it was 52 or 53. so he changed his mind becuase of 2 or 3 yards?

[bluerosekiller]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

Of course Lindell was pissed. You & I & everyone else here realize that he had every right to be. Unfortunately, that moronic coach Gaily clearly has no faith in any of his players other than Fitzpatrick. And, we've seen over & over again where there gets him & the team. Only he just can't seem to grasp it. And isn't that the definition of insanity? Doing the same thing over & over again & expecting a different result? Well, Gaily just doesn't seem to be able to accept the reality that putting the game in Fitz's hands is always going to result in a loss. So, he's GOT to go.

[trapezeus]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

so this weeks time line

nix on monday: i don't think we should change. we need to keep continuity
Tuesday: gailey, i think we need to stay with it. keep fighting. 8-8 got the giants in in the year 1932. let's keep playing,
Thursday : key player x is out.
Sunday: bills roll over and die.

rinse and repeat.

buhbye chan. that game sealed your fate.

[Novacane]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

during his press conference, Gaiey said he changed his mind becuase at first he was told that it was 50 yards, but then he saw it was 52 or 53. so he changed his mind becuase of 2 or 3 yards?

If our kickers only good for 50yds we need a new one

[colin]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

ok, is chan gailey the worst corch in the post levy era? i don't see how there's any controversy about it, he is.

[gebobs]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

How big was it for Chan not to go for the field goal earlier.

And why did he call a timeout to do so? Complete idiocy.

I better not hear anyone here try and say football under Gailey is entertaining.

[Ed]

Re: Play to win? LMAO Gailey has to go.

If he wasn't going to kick the FG he should have just gone for the first down. It was like 4th and 3. Punting from inside the 35 yd line is pathetic. I've tried to hold out hope for you Chan, but I'm tired of you.