When seeing Fitzpatrick putting up great numbers last year at the start of the season I thought Jim was too critical and just didn't like him. Fitzpatrick was in the top 5 QBs in the league and 5-2. I now know what Jimbo was understanding.
Jim Kelly had Fitpatrick pegged from the beggining and how many of us believed him?
Collapse
X
-
Re: Jim Kelly had Fitpatrick pegged from the beggining and how many of us believed hi
Originally posted by jpdex12 View PostWhen seeing Fitzpatrick putting up great numbers last year at the start of the season I thought Jim was too critical and just didn't like him. Fitzpatrick was in the top 5 QBs in the league and 5-2. I now know what Jimbo was understanding.
-
-
Re: Jim Kelly had Fitpatrick pegged from the beggining and how many of us believed hi
I don't recall many people supporting him. A lot of the discussion was based around the system protecting him! Well that complex system that can't make adjustments just doesn't win football games.
Comment
-
-
Re: Jim Kelly had Fitpatrick pegged from the beggining and how many of us believed hi
I don't know if anyone ever really suffered the delusion that Fitz was the replacement for Kelly that we've needed for 15 years, except for possibly a handful of blind homers.
I do think that most of us, myself included, thought- or at least hoped- that Fitz was good enough to win if he had the right tools around him.
We were wrong.
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Jim Kelly had Fitpatrick pegged from the beggining and how many of us believed hi
i thought fitz was going to be able to hold as a game manager after his decline last year was right in step with his injury. but htis year, injured or not, he looked terrible out the gate. he is a back up at best. i'd trust him in frank reich role. 2-3 games to grind out 1 or 2 wins to keep a season moving.
16 games is a no. conclusively proved by the san fran game this year if you are being conservative.
and fred's a back up RB next year. end of story.
-
👍 5
Comment
-
-
Re: Jim Kelly had Fitpatrick pegged from the beggining and how many of us believed hi
I was happy for his early success in 2011 but didn't want them to extend him, long term.
Now they're shoving him down our throats while the team sinks like a stone.Anonymity is an abused privilege, abused most by people who mistake vitriol for wisdom and cynicism for wit
-
👍 2
Comment
-
-
Re: Jim Kelly had Fitpatrick pegged from the beggining and how many of us believed hi
I ALWAYS thought Blitzpatrick a horrible choice for a long term starting QB. He had terrible numbers prior to the Bills "anointing" him the starter. The Rams didn't even want to keep him as a back up, for heaven's sake! But this team's front office seems to think, however, they can do things differently than all the other NFL teams and be successful and turn a career backup QB, and a mediocre one at that, into a 'starter'. Again and again, they are proven wrong.
One of the stupidest decisions this franchise ever made (and man, there have been some dumb ones by Wilson & Co.) was to sign Fitzpatrick long term, and essentially abandon the search to draft a franchise QB for two or three seasons. I will always suspect that both Nix & Gailey were simply being good "Yes" men and rubber stamping more Ralph Wilson Jr "Senior Moments".
This lowly cart.... it hits harder and has a higher yards
per play average than the Bills' offense!
Comment
-
Comment