Rubgy vs Football

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • imbondz
    Democrats are people too
    • Jan 2003
    • 26041

    Rubgy vs Football

    Since rugby players always say rugby is more dangerous cuz they play without pads, it'd be interesting to know what the level of concussions occur in Rugby, especially in Australia where it's a main sport.

    I'd love for todays' players to play with these older helmets and see how tough they are then. I can't stand when players come out and complain that the league is being babies by fining illegal hits, and changing rules that define what hits are legal, when 90% of them are on steroids, and those who complain are using their helmets to knock players out, instead of using fundamental tackling. You're never taught to tackle with your head.

    My faith doesn’t make me perfect, it makes me forgiven.

  • TigerJ
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 22575

    #2
    Re: Rubgy vs Football

    I'm sure there have been coachs around who said at some point, "Guys, ya gotta use your heads in this game."
    I've made up my mind. Don't confuse me with the facts.

    I'm the most reasonable poster here. If you don't agree, I'll be forced to have a hissy fit.

    Comment

    • Slim
      Registered User
      • Apr 2004
      • 7597

      #3
      Re: Rubgy vs Football

      I have U-18 rugby national championship ring. Not wearing traditional helmets does make you focus more on wrapping up and "dipping" the opponent.

      Comment

      • Mr. Miyagi
        Lecter's Little *****

        • Sep 2002
        • 53616

        #4
        Re: Rubgy vs Football

        I've said this all along. You want to reduce concussions in football? Take away their helmets. Leading with the head tackles will drop to almost zero immediately.

        Comment

        • BLeonard
          BoB Sabermetrician
          • Jan 2003
          • 4625

          #5
          Re: Rubgy vs Football

          Originally posted by Mr. Miyagi View Post
          I've said this all along. You want to reduce concussions in football? Take away their helmets. Leading with the head tackles will drop to almost zero immediately.
          I've said the exact same thing. IMO, many players feel that, because they have the helmet, they are protected from damage to the head and, as a result, use it as a weapon.

          If the helmet's not there, the leading with the head tackles won't be either, because the players will stop doing it.

          -Bill

          Comment

          • ParanoidAndroid
            My battery is low and it's getting dark.
            • Apr 2004
            • 16860

            #6
            Re: Rubgy vs Football

            Someday, someone is going to fly in just as a players helmet is ripped off and crush the helmetless guys skull.

            Comment

            • THE END OF ALL DAYS
              The Allen Era has begun.... no looking back now, come hell or high water!
              • Feb 2005
              • 4525

              #7
              Re: Rubgy vs Football

              There is no way they are taking helmets off football players.
              In my day we did not have self-esteem... we had self-respect, and no more of it then we earned.

              Comment

              • Cali512
                Registered User
                • Jan 2012
                • 6393

                #8
                Re: Rubgy vs Football

                No NFL player is on steroids. Its not that easy anymore. If your suspended for Maryjuanna, then your not getting away with any roid use. Think people!
                Not here to be right, just here to have interesting discussions about my impulsive opinions

                Comment

                • Buddo
                  Registered User
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 1864

                  #9
                  Re: Rubgy vs Football

                  Originally posted by Cali512 View Post
                  No NFL player is on steroids. Its not that easy anymore. If your suspended for Maryjuanna, then your not getting away with any roid use. Think people!
                  How naive can you possibly be?
                  The NFL and NFLPA even now haven't agreed to a way forward for testing for HGH, and yet you think guys aren't juicing?
                  The testing done by the NFL, is nowhere near as strict or frequent, as that done to top class athletes.
                  I don't doubt for one minute, that there are a lot of guys who are doing stuff out of season, that will help them. The NFL simply doesn't test people enough, or frequently enough, to determine what they do.

                  Comment

                  • MidnightVoice
                    Retired (mostly)
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 10791

                    #10
                    Re: Rubgy vs Football

                    Barack Obama has said he thinks the sport may be too violent. But, in terms or risk, how does it measure up against the British equivalent?


                    While American football may be a niche interest in the UK, rugby is often seen as similarly dangerous – so should David Cameron be as worried as President Obama? Not according to Jim McKenna, a professor of physical activity and health at Leeds Metropolitan University (and a rugby coach). He points out that American footballers tackle with their heads, butting each other in a way seldom seen in rugby. "They butt the opposition and their head is the tip of the missile, with an enormous body of weight behind them," says McKenna. Meanwhile, the helmets and padding the US sportsmen wear can actually make the situation worse, he thinks, encouraging them to use more force.

                    In rugby it is spinal injuries from scrums that are the most dangerous (110 rugby players in Britain have been paralysed by playing the game). Allyson Pollock, a professor of public health, says that she is very worried about amateur rugby players, and especially children. Coaches, she says, are not properly trained to look out for the signs of concussion or taught how to deal with it – although it can have serious problems for children's learning and cognitive functions. She would like to see large-scale studies of the effects of such injuries, and says the sport establishment needs to think carefully about tackles. In 2010, she called for scrums to be banned after a study found that 190 rugby matches at Scottish schools resulted in 37 injuries. "Most children are not going to go professional, so why are their bodies being mauled and mashed and battered?"

                    But to play
                    that’s the thing
                    shut up and deal
                    ~ Jesse May

                    Comment

                    • imbondz
                      Democrats are people too
                      • Jan 2003
                      • 26041

                      #11
                      Re: Rubgy vs Football

                      Originally posted by Cali512 View Post
                      No NFL player is on steroids. Its not that easy anymore. If your suspended for Maryjuanna, then your not getting away with any roid use. Think people!

                      LOL
                      My faith doesn’t make me perfect, it makes me forgiven.

                      Comment

                      • imbondz
                        Democrats are people too
                        • Jan 2003
                        • 26041

                        #12
                        Re: Rubgy vs Football

                        Originally posted by MidnightVoice View Post
                        http://www.guardian.co.uk/sport/shor...more-dangerous

                        While American football may be a niche interest in the UK, rugby is often seen as similarly dangerous – so should David Cameron be as worried as President Obama? Not according to Jim McKenna, a professor of physical activity and health at Leeds Metropolitan University (and a rugby coach). He points out that American footballers tackle with their heads, butting each other in a way seldom seen in rugby. "They butt the opposition and their head is the tip of the missile, with an enormous body of weight behind them," says McKenna. Meanwhile, the helmets and padding the US sportsmen wear can actually make the situation worse, he thinks, encouraging them to use more force.

                        In rugby it is spinal injuries from scrums that are the most dangerous (110 rugby players in Britain have been paralysed by playing the game). Allyson Pollock, a professor of public health, says that she is very worried about amateur rugby players, and especially children. Coaches, she says, are not properly trained to look out for the signs of concussion or taught how to deal with it – although it can have serious problems for children's learning and cognitive functions. She would like to see large-scale studies of the effects of such injuries, and says the sport establishment needs to think carefully about tackles. In 2010, she called for scrums to be banned after a study found that 190 rugby matches at Scottish schools resulted in 37 injuries. "Most children are not going to go professional, so why are their bodies being mauled and mashed and battered?"
                        thanks, great article. so your options are being paralyzed for life, or blowing your brains out at 45-50 because your brain is fried and makes you crazy. those are your only two options. lol.
                        My faith doesn’t make me perfect, it makes me forgiven.

                        Comment

                        • Buddo
                          Registered User
                          • Mar 2007
                          • 1864

                          #13
                          Re: Rubgy vs Football

                          The biggest lesson that the NFL can learn from rugby, is how to tackle properly. Done properly, even relatively small guys, stop some seriously large guys, in their tracks.
                          The point made about helmets being used as part of trying to stop someone, in the NFL, is well made. The biggest difficulty, is the level of protection that NFL players wear elsewhere. Without some form of protection to your head, you could get quite badly damaged off of some of the body armor that gets worn.
                          It isn't just 'helmet to helmet' hits that are an issue though. There are some pretty suspect cases of 'helmet to knee' that occur, also.
                          I believe there's good enough reasons for not allowing helmets in the NFL, that some sort of serious investigation, should be made into it.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X