If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
All: The new Billszone site with the updated software is scheduled to be turned on Tuesday, May 21, 2024. The company that built it, Dynascale, estimates a FOUR HOUR shut down, from 8pm Pacific, (5pm Eastern) while they get it up and running. Nobody will be able to post in any forum until they are done. Afterwards, you may need to do a web search for the site, as old links will not work, because the site is getting a new IP address. Please be patient. If there are bugs, we will tackle them one at a time. Remember the goal is to be up and running with no glitches by camp. Doing this now assures us of that, because it gives us all summer to get our ducks in a row. Thank you!
Please use this thread to report any issues you come across
http://www.billszone.com/fanzone/forum/feedback-forums/billszone-q-a/6521455-upgrade-report-bugs-here
The quarterback-needy teams in the AFC East both have their eye on USC prospect Matt Barkley. According to Peter King of Sports Illustrated, Barkley met with nine teams at the NFL combine -- and the New York Jets and Buffalo Bills were in that group.
Well, after hearing Barkley talk about Cali QBs, I like him a lot more than I did. He said he is not a Surfer dude, Football is his passion. I do like the sound of that, but I still don't think he has a strong enough arm for Buffalo.
Can you please get past your blind narrow hate of all things USC Barkley would be good value in the 2nd Round
Blind narrow hate? The guy regressed greatly his senior year and is coming off an injury. And he won't be there in the 2nd. If the FO wants him, it's gotta be at 8. And that's terrible value.
Blind narrow hate? The guy regressed greatly his senior year and is coming off an injury. And he won't be there in the 2nd. If the FO wants him, it's gotta be at 8. And that's terrible value.
I would love to see the Jets draft him at #9. He would be a good fit on that team with Sanchez.
Blind narrow hate? The guy regressed greatly his senior year and is coming off an injury. And he won't be there in the 2nd. If the FO wants him, it's gotta be at 8. And that's terrible value.
I don't necessarily love him, but the terrible value thing is overrated.
Didn't you buy a huge screen LED LCD tv within a couple of months of it first coming out? Wouldn't it be much better value to wait until the prices drop after a couple years? But no, you wanted it AT THE TIME so you paid premium for it. That's how it works, if you want something, especially if you NEED something desperately, you go get it even though you're paying more than you have to for it.
Blind narrow hate? The guy regressed greatly his senior year and is coming off an injury. And he won't be there in the 2nd. If the FO wants him, it's gotta be at 8. And that's terrible value.
Just stop with the value crap.
Will Matt Barkley solve our problems at quarterback? Yes or no.
If the answer is yes, you pull the trigger. PERIOD. END OF STORY. CLOSE THE BOOK AND RETURN TO THE LIBRARY.
2013 "My Should Have" Draft Posted During the 2013 Draft 1 - (16): Geno Smith, QB, West Virginia
2 - (41): Robert Woods, WR, USC
2 - (46): Arthur Brown, LB, Kansas State
3 - (78): Quinton Patton, WR, Louisiana Tech
4 - (105): Barrett Jones, OG, Alabama
5 - (143): Brandon Jenkins, LB, Florida State
6 - (177): Da'Rick Rogers, WR, Tennessee Tech
7 - (222): Tyler Bray, QB, Tennessee
What is funny is I was thinking about my TV TODAY. I did wait a while & bought a refurbished 47" VIZIO on EBAY for $400. I think I could get a better deal today.
Will Matt Barkley solve our problems at quarterback? Yes or no.
If the answer is yes, you pull the trigger. PERIOD. END OF STORY. CLOSE THE BOOK AND RETURN TO THE LIBRARY.
I don't disagree. In fact i said somwthing similar in a different thread. Here's the problem: we don't know the answer to that. No one does, and no one will until he's been aging for two years or so.
So, who's most likely to give us the most value at 8? Given Barkley's injury and regression, it ain't him.
I don't necessarily love him, but the terrible value thing is overrated.
Didn't you buy a huge screen LED LCD tv within a couple of months of it first coming out? Wouldn't it be much better value to wait until the prices drop after a couple years? But no, you wanted it AT THE TIME so you paid premium for it. That's how it works, if you want something, especially if you NEED something desperately, you go get it even though you're paying more than you have to for it.
Let's just hope that it would work out better than those folks (myself included) that bought into WebOS..or the first people that bought the plasma televisions that got images burned into them...or the people that bought Windows Vista...or anyone who bought mini-disks...or Sega 32X...or HD DVD players...or a Zune.
What is funny is I was thinking about my TV TODAY. I did wait a while & bought a refurbished 47" VIZIO on EBAY for $400. I think I could get a better deal today.
You paid $400 for it? What a terrible value. Should've waited 6 months and got it for $300. In the meantime you should've used the extra $100 to fill some other void in your life, for better value. Of course, that's because we know exactly when the price point is good enough value for us to buy. In fact, I bet making millions on the stock market would be so easy because we know to pass on terrible values when we see them, knowing the future and all.
Tweet
Comment