Power play 3 for 59 ??

[Skooby]

Sounds like a power loss if anything. Maybe Vanek isn't worth his salt & is overpaid but man this is brutal.

[don137]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

I believe Vanek is the only player to score a power play goal in the month of February. No other Sabres scored on the PP.

[gebobs]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

Sounds like a power loss if anything. Maybe Vanek isn't worth his salt & is overpaid but man this is brutal.

Jesus...not you now. Vanek is not overpaid.

[PTI]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

How would you like to have Campbell running the PP? Maybe instead of Errhoff.

[Skooby]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

Jesus...not you now. Vanek is not overpaid.

I'm just kidding about that but 3 for 59 sucks.

[DetDannyWilliams]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

Thu Feb 28, 2013 (BUF)Ennis, T.PPG, (11:00 in 1st)

[trapezeus]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

i wonder if having pominville on the point is a good place to start with changes. he sucks. that 5-3 in OT, they hardly moved the puck around to get the goalie moving laterally. these are the problems of the last 7 years easily.

at the rate this team makes changes, pominville will retire before we remove him from the point.

[SkateZilla]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

Poms on the Point is a Bust, how many 2 on 1's did Erhoff have to bail him out of last night?

[PTI]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

This is ridiculous, all the other teams get pass across for tap ins on 5 on 3 and we are taking one time slap shots the whole time.

[Skooby]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

This is ridiculous, all the other teams get pass across for tap ins on 5 on 3 and we are taking one time slap shots the whole time.

We scored & then Myers won't block a shot.

[OpIv37]

Re: Power play 3 for 59 ??

We now have 3 shorties to 4 PP goals. It just defies all logic.