ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

[THATHURMANATOR]

TIME FOR A QB IS NOW.

GET ONE OF THEM!!!

[Joe Fo Sho]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

What a well presented argument.

[THATHURMANATOR]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

What else do I need to say?

[JoeMama]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

TIME FOR A QB IS NOW.

GET ONE OF THEM!!!

OK!!!

[T-Long]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

I'm thinking the same thing....cut Fitz, sign whichever of these QBs are there at 8, let rookie and T-Jax battle it out and camp

[trapezeus]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

time for another Thurm email in caps stating the obvious but making the wrong selections. is thurm russ?

[Joe Fo Sho]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

What else do I need to say?

Maybe explain why you think either one of these players is worthy of our 8th overall pick, or saying when you want to select these players. Or why you think that Geno will be available when we select. Or why Barkley is a good fit to play in Buffalo weather. There are probably other things you could say to make your argument, it's not just limited to what I've suggested.

Basically, anything other than saying "ERMAHGERD!!! WE NEED A QUARTERBACK!!! LET'S TAKE ONE OF THE PLAYERS THAT IS LISTED AS A QB! ERMAHGERD!!!"

[Mr. Miyagi]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

TIME FOR A QB IS NOW.

GET ONE OF THEM!!!

I'm with Thurm. I have no problem taking one of these 2 at #8. All the other ones are reaches in the 1st though.

[ThunderGun]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

I'm with Thurm. I have no problem taking one of these 2 at #8. All the other ones are reaches in the 1st though.

Just my opinion, but I wouldn't touch Barkley at 8.

[Jaybird]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

We all know we have the need for a QB. however, reaching for one is beyond risky. Geno seems to be the standout of a very average draft class. Dafting the worng Qb this year will effect the team at least for another 3 years. We can't afford to have the wrong man behind centre for that long.
I don't even consider barkley to be an option as he hasn;t shown much. he hasn;t won the big game, he has a noodle for an arm. USC has plenty of talent on the roster, and he was just not good enough to win. lets not forget to mention what we've seen from the previous USC QB. Cut Fitz without question, and draft a QB (just not in the first round) and try and bring someone else to give Jackson some competition.

[Night Train]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

We all know we have the need for a QB. however, reaching for one is beyond risky. Geno seems to be the standout of a very average draft class. Dafting the worng Qb this year will effect the team at least for another 3 years. We can't afford to have the wrong man behind centre for that long.
I don't even consider barkley to be an option as he hasn;t shown much. he hasn;t won the big game, he has a noodle for an arm. USC has plenty of talent on the roster, and he was just not good enough to win. lets not forget to mention what we've seen from the previous USC QB. Cut Fitz without question, and draft a QB (just not in the first round) and try and bring someone else to give Jackson some competition.

[RedEyE]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

IMO, if its not Geno, wait it out until the 2nd round.

[DraftBoy]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

I like Geno and have no issue taking him but at this point I'd pass and wait to see what Round 2 or 3 hold.

[Yasgur's Farm]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

IMO... No fooling around...
1) If Smith is there at 8, we gotta take him PLUS EJ Manuel in the 3rd.
2) If Smith is gone, grab Barkley at 8 PLUS Nassib in the 2nd.

[HAMMER]

Re: ITS TIME TAKE GENO OR BARKLEY

IMO... No fooling around...
1) If Smith is there at 8, we gotta take him PLUS EJ Manuel in the 3rd.
2) If Smith is gone, grab Barkley at 8 PLUS Nassib in the 2nd.

Silly, just silly.