If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tatonka
    Registered User
    • Jul 2002
    • 21289

    If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

    just wondering what your thoughts are..

    my thought is that if that FA has any other option or is not significantly overpaid, id look elsewhere. sucks but realistically, i see it being very tough to compete with what any other team can offer.
    "All hockey players are bilingual. They know English and profanity." ~ Gordie Howe
  • BADTHINGSMAN
    Registered User
    • Oct 2002
    • 10504

    #2
    Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

    If I have other options then no. If it is my only option then yes of course.

    Comment

    • YardRat
      Well, lookie here...
      • Dec 2004
      • 86262

      #3
      Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

      Depends on how much of a role I'm going to be expected to play. I'd rather start for a new team trying to build a winner, than sit on the bench for somebody that is already there.

      But that's just me...the initial premise certainly is valid.
      YardRat Wall of Fame
      #56 DARRYL TALLEY
      #29 DERRICK BURROUGHS#22 FRED JACKSON #95 KYLE WILLIAMS

      Comment

      • HAMMER
        I'm right, Miyagi is wrong.
        • Jul 2003
        • 8132

        #4
        Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

        Buffalo, Jax, and Cleveland would be the last options for me.

        Comment

        • SpikedLemonade
          • Jun 2024

          #5
          Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

          Originally posted by BADTHINGSMAN View Post
          If I have other options then no. If it is my only option then yes of course.
          AND if you are a player with no other options, how good can you be?

          Comment

          • jamze132
            Don’t hate…
            • Jun 2003
            • 29377

            #6
            Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

            I think players that know they are better than the rest, they'll want to play for a winner unless they're offered enough money to say otherwise. Younger guys who are trying to make a name for theirselves will play for a team where they have an opportunity to start in a system to maximize their skill set.

            The problem for unsuccessful teams like our beloved Bills is that we have to overpay even a mediocre player to come in. We basically have to strike lightening in a bottle with free agents to be successful and draft extrememely we'll to turn it around so future free agents worth a damn to come here.

            Comment

            • Albany,n.y.
              Registered User
              • Jul 2002
              • 5599

              #7
              Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

              If I'm a free agent on my last legs, I wouldn't go to the team with no QB, rookie coach's 1st year status is totally irrelevant if I come away with a strong impression of the guy. On the other hand, if the head coach was a buffoon, even if he was a veteran coach, I'd want nothing to do with the team. If I was a young free agent, I wouldn't care about either. I would only care if I though the team had no chance to win a Super Bowl throughout the length of my contract.
              Why would any player with more than a year left in his career care if he was signing on with a team with a rookie head coach? To me there's a much stronger possibility of stability than with a guy on shaky grounds. Where would you, if you were a player, want to be-a team with a rookie head coach, or a team with a guy who is rated in the top 5 coaches on the hot seat, like the Jets? As a free agent, a guy who fits the system of the rookie head coach has a lot more job security than with anyone but the most entrenched of NFL coaches.

              Comment

              • BADTHINGSMAN
                Registered User
                • Oct 2002
                • 10504

                #8
                Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

                Originally posted by SpikedLemonade View Post
                AND if you are a player with no other options, how good can you be?
                Which is why you take the only option.

                Comment

                • Mr. Pink
                  Peterman Sucks!
                  • Mar 2006
                  • 35303

                  #9
                  Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

                  Originally posted by HAMMER View Post
                  Buffalo, Jax, and Cleveland would be the last options for me.
                  Yet Cleveland still landed players in FA.

                  Money talks.

                  Comment

                  • OpIv37
                    Acid Douching Asswipe
                    • Sep 2002
                    • 101286

                    #10
                    Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

                    I said this in another thread:

                    I have no idea why any WR or TE would even consider Buffalo while we have no QB. If there are any other options available, they are not coming here. Right now, we have seriously the worst QB situation in the NFL, with the possible exception of Arizona if they cut Kolb. It's a death sentence for a WR or TE.
                    MiKiDo Facebook
                    MiKiDo Website

                    Comment

                    • soapman
                      Registered User
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 523

                      #11
                      Re: If your a FA, do you really want to go to a team with no qb and a rookie HC?

                      Originally posted by OpIv37 View Post
                      I said this in another thread:

                      I have no idea why any WR or TE would even consider Buffalo while we have no QB. If there are any other options available, they are not coming here. Right now, we have seriously the worst QB situation in the NFL, with the possible exception of Arizona if they cut Kolb. It's a death sentence for a WR or TE.
                      Exactly my point

                      - - - Updated - - -

                      Originally posted by FunTimesYaY! View Post
                      Yet Cleveland still landed players in FA.

                      Money talks.
                      Did Cleveland sign someone worthwhile and I missed it?


                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X