MikeInRoch
04-29-2013, 10:25 AM
With all the debate lately over who is/isn't/could turn into/likely will never be a franchise Quarterback, it seems like part of the debate is over what the definition of a Franchise Quarterback actually is.
Is it:
A quarterback who plays well enough year to year to make the Pro Bowl on a consistent basis?
A quarterback who makes the playoffs on a consistent basis?
A quarterback who is capable of being *the* reason the team wins games?
A quarterback who has won the Super Bowl?
A QB who is the unquestioned leader of your team?
Depending on your definition, there could be very few "Franchise QBs" in the NFL, or quite a few. So is that an elite label that you only put on the top 5-6? Or do a lot of teams have a "Franchise QB?"
Is it:
A quarterback who plays well enough year to year to make the Pro Bowl on a consistent basis?
A quarterback who makes the playoffs on a consistent basis?
A quarterback who is capable of being *the* reason the team wins games?
A quarterback who has won the Super Bowl?
A QB who is the unquestioned leader of your team?
Depending on your definition, there could be very few "Franchise QBs" in the NFL, or quite a few. So is that an elite label that you only put on the top 5-6? Or do a lot of teams have a "Franchise QB?"